Savely Yurkovsky – FCT® – Field Control Therapy

Description

Savely Yurkovsky – FCT® – Field Control Therapy

---

Home

Important Notice:
We strongly advise anyone who is seeking referrals to qualified FCT practitioners to contact our office and no other office for the relevant information. Unfortunately, we continue to encounter incidences where practitioners with very limited training and skills in FCT improperly claim to be sufficiently qualified.

—————

These groundbreaking video courses will change the way you view, treat diseases and practice medicine.
For a limited time only – 2023 Special FCT Offer
“I am looking forward to your newest DVDs and have found your other DVD sets to be immensely groundbreaking. FCT has transformed my life.”
“Your FCT is all the way kept in my mind as I kept watching and taking the notes for many hours and pages. It is one of the most effective ways of practicing and you are the first one to have taught it so clear in a scientific way of thinking.”

Get Savely Yurkovsky – FCT® – Field Control Therapy download

1. Video program: The Extremely Complex Hidden Nature of Chronic Disease and Proper Bio-Resonance Testing, as the Only Key to Unlock It $295
“You cannot imagine how excited I am in learning and practicing FCT under Dr. Yurkovsky’s guidance. I have been reading, studying and listening to the concepts at least 4+ hours/daytrying to absorb as much as possible before the seminar. After more than 40+ years in the CAM field, I feel I have finally come home. As the saying goes, ‘When the student is ready, the teacher will come.’”

2. Video program: Basic DVD Course $225
“As I am watching the 2004 Basic seminar… it is terrific!”

“I am completely replacing my current method of treatment with FCT. I have been a student of “functional medicine” for years and have never truly gotten the long-term result in patients that I expected. While watching the Basic FCT Seminar I knew FCT is what I have been searching for. Thanks again!”

3. Video program: FCT 2018 $295
“First of all, I would like to express my appreciation to you and Dr. Yurkovsky for the very informative seminar. For me, it was a “tour de force” in terms of information, but I enjoyed every minute of it.”

“I thought you might enjoy seeing the email I received from my client yesterday. It really speaks to how attending your seminar and applying the concepts we learned is already yielding positive results. Clients are feeling better, which is the whole point of what we do!”

Why FCT and what is its purpose?

“Our healthcare is catastrophically dysfunctional.” Scientific American, January 2013

“If there is a dirty little secret in our profession, it is this: there is a paucity of scientific evidence

for most things we doctors do, orthodox and alternative.”

Editor, “Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine” and book author, Larry Dossey, MD.

“The search for truth also implies a duty.”
Einstein

If medicine were an exact science, like physics, this detailed homepage could have been replaced with less than a one-line math formula proving that all the current conventional and alternative integrative approaches cannot possibly solve the epidemics of chronic diseases. Certainly, the underlying deficiencies also lead to the avoidable acute diseases, including seasonal flu, coronavirus, bacterial and other infections. The following synopsis is for those who wish to get a brief grasp, for more detailed information presented further.

Synopsis of the reasons for failure in chronic diseases in medicine:

The answer to these has little to do with medical approaches, all of which justify their use by claiming some science behind them, but exclusively in the nature and definition of science itself. “Science is a seamless web of knowledge in order to understand laws and principles of nature and how to use these best to solve complex problems.”

The key words: “Web”=total pertinent knowledge and “seamless”= free of conflict with other sciences, and this is where medical approaches fall short. The proper knowledge of the web, quoting a Nobel Laureate in physics, late Soviet professor Peter Kapitza PhD, enables to fulfill the first of the two main endeavors in science, “deepen the exploitation of already known.” This allows medicine to become far more reliable, effective and logical even without exactness of math. A good example of this is well reflected by the tragedy of the coronavirus pandemic.

The seemingly correct scientific explanation but based only on one science, molecular biology: “We could not contain the pandemic because of the absence of a pharmaceutical vaccine.” This is true as vaccines do save millions of lives but is only a part of the web.

However, from the rest of it emerges another sound and effective option that can be exploited from knowledge of physics. This offers that: “In the absence of pharmaceutical, molecular COVID-19 vaccine, we can use a submolecular, energetic identity of COVID-19 to produce an energetic vaccine. This, in addition to being protective can also be a curative for carriers and already sick patients. Simple logic from this is amplified if we assign an equal 25% of legitimacy to each key component of this issue: coronavirus molecule, its pharmaceutical vaccine, submolecular energy field of the virus and its energy field vaccine, imprinted in water. Yet, only the first component, carrying its 25% share, has been considered. The conclusion then emerges that the coronavirus pandemic has resulted in the world tragedy not only due to the high virulence of COVID-19, but because it was handled through as much as 75% deficiency in the available options. Can any technology, corporation or military effectively function on only 25% of the necessary knowledge and resources to sustain competition? Besides, another root of the 75% shortage stems also from violation of the “seamless” concept. There the energetic coronavirus homeopathic vaccine could have a good option yet because of the laws of chemistry, such as Avogadro number 1:1024 concerning dilutions, render such vaccines “empty,” or free of active substance, homeopathy has been relegated to “diluted placebos.” However, this notion represents a serious seam with physics that is a virtual supreme court in science that offers higher understanding and explanatory power of nature than chemistry. Physics, that is a virtual supreme court in science, deems homeopathic and digitally imprinted solutions to be biologically active energetic substances. Not surprisingly, the abundance of scientific and clinical data support their actions. The most dramatic among these, a recent successful Cuban trial on as many as 2.5 million people of homeopathic vaccine to prevent the fatal epidemic of leptospirosis. This brought the mortality to zero and hospital visits to virtually none. Yet, this study, for non-scientific reasons, was rejected for publication by conventional peer reviewed journals. Thus, leaving homeopathy in its usual “unscientific” corner and our healthcare thin in its web of options.

The rest of this home page presents facts and reasons for many common, principal deficiencies alike in both conventional and alternative-integrative approaches.

As any website might be the ‘most’ or ‘best’ in something, this website is the most candid and analytical in medicine for explaining reasons for failure in both conventional and alternative-integrative medicines in providing quality care.

The purpose of this program is to finally transform unproductive medical services into high quality reliable science by:

placing it on a sound scientific foundation, one of reliable principles as used by the premiere science of all, physics

to save alternative-integrative practitioners from wasting significant amount of time and resources in trying to accomplish the impossible – to succeed in reversals of chronic diseases using countless approaches unfit for this. To expose how this industry fools and exploits them, by concealing through hype significant limitations and side effects of these treatments.

providing conventional and alternative medical practitioners with fundamental information to reduce the serious gaps in their respective education and services in order to substantially elevate quality of care and reduce astronomical wasteful healthcare costs

offering training in effective truly integrative medicine, FCT, that is based on the rigorous scientific standards

conducting clinical trials in order to formally establish the efficacy of FCT in a wide variety of chronic and acute diseases

returning medicine to medical and osteopathic doctors who have been turned by the pharmaceutical industry into the salesmen and women of its costly merchandise which is incapable of reversing chronic diseases.

This distribution and its mindset doomed them to professional failures and frustrations as well as loss of disgruntled patients to a chaotic and dysfunctional alternative market.*
* While both classical homeopathy and traditional Chinese medicine are no longer capable of reversing chronic diseases in deeply poisoned modern populations, these modalities are excluded from the derogatory references to alternative and integrative medicine.

Laymen who wish to obtain important information about the serious limitations of the majority of ineffective, costly and, often, harmful approaches and products in alternative and integrative medicine are welcome to peruse this information and study the media from this website: DVDs, articles, e-letters, and webinar recordings. These explain the logistics of these failures and present a great variety of medical subjects and diseases. This information offers a significant edifying benefit as the demand for alternative services is as high as their unrealistic expectations. These expectations have not been met even as many patients or families of patients have spent exorbitant resources on “integrative” services particularly for Lyme, autism, and many other diseases. I have seen families become destitute, as the result, and it is about time that the truth concerning the serious limitations of these hyped treatments is to come out.
The necessity of this purpose is

The skyrocketing epidemics of chronic diseases worldwide due to the mistaken century-long experiment by the main medical industry, conventional medicine, to contain these through pharmaceutical agents. As a result, the public has logistically swayed to alternative medicine and a haphazard combination of the two, integrative medicine, which short of sporadic short-lived successes in milder conditions, proved ineffective.

“Medicine has failed in the care of chronic diseases. None of the types of research or clinical trials have made a difference because we have not identified a cause.”
Professor Colin J. Alexander, MD
The reasons for failure
1. The main reason for failure is the inability to determine and treat main causes of chronic diseases due to gross deficiencies in medical education and training.
Deficiencies in conventional medicine

“Mechanistic chemical paradigm failed.”
Two-time nominee for Nobel prize in medicine,
Professor Robert Becker, MD

There is no better way to assure this failure than conventional medical education, since it is void in the information concerning the majority of causes of chronic diseases as well as the proper diagnostic and therapeutic means to address them. This concerns environmental, lifestyle, certain infectious and other important sources of these causes. An education in the main science of the environmental sources of all chronic diseases – toxicology − is virtually nonexistent and from poisoned children to even more poisoned adults everyone is “treated” with just piles of drugs. Even an elementary medical necessity such as a healthy diet remains a mystery in medical education, from pediatrics to geriatrics where, as recently reported by the American Journal of Medicine, the majority of cardiologists do not even know what a healthy heart diet is. (Stephen Devries, et al, A Deficiency of Nutrition Education and Practice in Cardiology, AJM, Vol. 130, No. 11, Nov. 2017). Yet, they are trigger-happy for costly cholesterol-lowering drugs with many side effects. Likewise, physicians readily prescribe glucose lowering drugs for pre- and diabetes type 2, before offering proper dietary, weight loss and exercise regiments, about which they have very vague knowledge.
In alternative medicine

Starting with its top tier – naturopathic doctors – and down the ladder, none possesses the necessary conventional medical knowledge needed to succeed. Even when alternative practitioners stumble on important causes of disease, they do not have enough knowledge to properly manage these within a very complex multisystemic physiologic network of the body, or utilize effective diagnostic tests and treatments. Likewise, an absence of knowledge in toxicology and an inferior one in infectious diseases, which agents cause 100% of all chronic diseases, plus unawareness of potential and limits of, even, their own modalities seal their failures.
In Integrative Medicine

Medical and osteopathic doctors who experiment with alternative approaches are not aware of these handicaps of alternative medicine and blindly consume whatever this cheerful industry offers them. The following is a concrete example of alternative medicine being completely ignorant of the capabilities of its own treatments. In 2015, at the height of the Ebola virus epidemic in the US, I contacted the Office of Alternative and Integrative Medicine under NIH to seek its assistance in treating these patients with the novel FCT version of homeopathy, based on important knowledge of conventional medicine and other relevant sciences. This approach has yielded superior results over the years with treating infections without the use of antibiotics, anti-viral or other antimicrobial drugs. This has been the case with chronic Lyme disease, PANDAS, MRSA, persistent prostate and urinary bladder infections, herpes and HPV, all with known poor outcomes in the use of antimicrobial drugs. To my shocking surprise, the staff advised me that it could not assist me because it was eliminated from the grant program by this office, headed by an MD and run by naturopathic doctors. They obviously were not aware of homeopathy possessing by far the most powerful biological action of all treatments, or the ways it could be effectively used against even the most deadly infections. Yet, grants were available for treatments which qualify for the notorious back rubs and were a waste of taxpayers’ money.

One of many classic examples of this blind-leading-the-blind tandem is a book with the catchy title, Autism Revolution, by a medical doctor ‘open-minded’ to alternative medicine, Harvard autism researcher Martha Herbert MD, PhD. There, she displays the common ‘virtues’ of the current simplistic pharmaceutical medical training by being able to relate only to its alternative, and just as crippled, pharmaceutical siblings. In this case, the sibling is so-called functional medicine which was concocted by a biochemist who does not have even a formal medical education. The chances for successful reversals of chronic diseases, on this basis alone, is as likely as a handyman constructing flying space rockets. It is not a big surprise that aside from functional medicine succeeding only in selling its own line of costly ‘natural’ products devised by the biochemist, I was not able to find a single documented chronic disease reversed by this ‘medicine’. Read the statement of a practitioner who tried to practice this (dys)functional medicine. “I am completely replacing my current method of treatment with FCT. I have been a student of “functional medicine” for years and have never truly gotten the long term results in patients that I expected. While watching the Basic FCT Seminar I knew FCT is what I have been searching for. Thanks again!” Even a lay person, a patient of mine, shared with me that, based on science fundamentals learned from her father, she recognized that functional medicine is just another cleverly designed business and refused it, yet thousands of alternative-integrative practitioners practice it with pride. [For more details on Autism Revolution, see my critique of this book, on Amazon. Information on functional medicine and common deceptive marketing ploys used by the ‘natural’ industry to sell senseless products for exorbitant costs, can be gathered from DVD/USB recording of Dr. Yurkovsky’s seminar, The Extremely Complex Hidden Nature of Chronic Diseases and Proper Bio-Resonance Testing, as the Only Key to Unlock These].
Nobel Laureate in Medicine,
Professor Albert Szent-Györgyi, PhD

The reasons the open-minded conventional academicians and alternative-integrative practitioners cannot discern the futility of ‘natural’ pharmaceuticals is because that on surface these are based on biology and body chemistry which render millions of material targets among tissues, organs and biochemical entities to be logical targets for pharmaceutical actions and their respective enterprises. However, this took place at the exclusion of other important sciences such as physics and its fundamental concept of energy related to all living concerning the same tissues, organs and biochemistry where, quoting Nobel laureate in medicine, Professor Albert Szent-Györgyi, PhD, “studying the living without the concept of energy amounts to studying dead matter”.

The concept of energy of living cells carries a great practical value for practice of medicine because it allows to finally determine, through Bio-resonance testing that is based on physics, the true causes of chronic diseases inside the very origin of all diseases—internal organs, themselves. Energetic treatment modality, homeopathy, based on physics too, possesses a unique and superior to any other therapy property to deliver strictly specific signals to the body to release, or neutralize these causes. This specificity factor plays a fundamental role in this process and medicine, in general, as confirmed through a specific successful action of conventional vaccines, which had been long preceded by homeopathic vaccines. Yet, while Bio-resonance testing and homeopathy are based on physics, the lack of its proper education in biology has been emphasized by Harvard biology Professor Edward O. Wilson, PhD: “When biologists hear of a string theory in physics they confuse it with violins”. The same holds true for medical doctors. As the consequence, conventional medical literature and the general media disseminate scientifically ignorant statements about homeopathy. One of these was issued by two professors and former editors of the prestigious conventional medical periodical, The New England Journal of Medicine. There, as usual, it was stated that because homeopathic remedies are so diluted that based on chemistry they have to be void of original substance and medicinal action and, therefore, represent placebos. They, also, displayed even more ignorance in science by stating that homeopathy “violates fundamental scientific laws.” (Alternative Medicine – The Risks of Untested and Unregulated Remedies. NEJM, Sept. 1998, Vol. 339, #12).

Do these photos of a recovered infant, within days on FCT homeopathic treatment, after conventional pediatric and dermatological treatments failed, look like the result of a placebo that violates fundamental scientific laws?! How about these photos of the boy who has been cured from incurable autoimmune condition, vitiligo, through the same means? In both cases Bio-resonance testing determined exact causes of these conditions and homeopathic-energetic signals turned the body defenses against these. Likewise, Bioresonance testing diagnosed this patient with worm infection and following just homeopathic-energetic signals, instead of toxic costly anti-parasitic drugs, she released these worms. And has emailed us this photo and comment:

—-Original Message—–
From: Donna
To: Dr. Yurkovsky
Sent: Wed, Jul 30, 2014 10:11AM
Subject: As Requested: Photo of Intestinal Worms Released in July

Hi Dr. Yurkovsky: As requested, I am attaching a photo of worms released from my intestines on July 25, 2 days after I finished my remedies for this month.
See you on August 8th. Donna.

Besides, fundamental scientific laws have been established by physics, not chemistry or pharmacology, and as no surprise, reputable physicists have deemed such ‘scientific’ statements about homeopathy as “distortion of and ignorance in science”. (Rustom Roy, PhD, William A. Tiller, PhD, Iris Bell, MD, PhD, The Structure of Liquid Water; Novel Insights from Materials Research; Potential Relevance to Homeopathy, Materials Research Innovations 9-4: 1433-075X). Among other physicists, Nobel laureate in Physics, Cambridge University Professor Brian Josephson, PhD has expressed the same opinion in defense of homeopathy concerning such ‘experts’. My email to both editors asking them to elucidate the exact fundamental scientific laws in question remained unanswered. This goes beyond just a mistake, but a complete embarrassment reflecting the ignorance of medical doctors in, even, basic principles of science. A brilliant, internationally known British bio-physicist and researcher Mae Van Ho, PhD, referred to the omission of physics from biology and medicine as “excluded biology.” Echoed her another prominent biologist, Cambridge University researcher, Rupert Sheldrake, PhD, referring in his book to medical research excluding physics as The Science Delusion. Unfortunately, the industry has turned the delusion into a gold mine and keeps it alive at any cost, no less than 2.5 trillion dollars annually, while not having a cure for a single chronic disease. At any cost also includes forgery of as many as 50% of published clinical studies, as per the official statistics, with made up positive effects of drugs.

To complete the dead end, the education in both medicines is void even of fundamental criteria of sound scientific theory, which represents the main distinction between science and ‘good ideas’ in pseudoscience. When I once polled a group of integrative MDs and DOs on the subject, no one knew the difference. The absence of this knowledge alone precludes medical practitioners from critical assessment of the true value of medical approaches, treatments and products, that has made it easy for medical industries to exploit them. These black holes in either medicine seal this blind-leading-the-blind tandem in integrative medicine. In a nutshell, the chances for integrative medicine to succeed by randomly combining all of the failed approaches are as high as for a new corporation to succeed by combining bankrupt companies, which have not corrected the reasons for their failure. Still, credit is due to those medical schools which experiment with this program because this is a worthy goal, after all, which FCT has already accomplished. In the meantime, the catchy term, ‘integrative medicine’, which alleges the best of two worlds has been just the opposite due to simple math rendering a higher number of administered blindly actions to exponentially increase their risk of errors, amounting to failure and harm in medicine. This is no different from computer repair men inserting a higher number of screw drivers in it blindly. That is why, at this time, the term integrative medicine has succeeded more in marketing of ‘integrative centers’ than healing their patients.
2. Using formal scientific findings related to disease to conceal the low quality of medical services mislead practitioners and patients concerning.

Most of the time, this constitutes the greatest deceit in the era of modern science since so many ineffective, unnecessary and harmful treatments and products have been used in its name. The misleading is made easy by deficient education in proper science structure, methodology and even ability to properly interpret published medical studies.

A detailed analysis of both medicines, by Professor Ronald A. Koretz, MD, has confirmed the prevailing pattern of false claims, selective reporting of data with rare success cases while silencing prevailing failures, all under a formal cover of science. (Integrative Gastroenterology, by Gerard E. Mullin MD, CH. There is No Alternative to Evidence). He commented on a publication bias, where favorite treatments are readily accepted and hyped, whereas successes of a competition are rejected. Such patterns create unrealistic expectations of many treatments which amount to a mirage, which particularly prevails in alternative-integrative medicine. Professor Koretz noted that practitioners in both medicines are not trained to discern false information reported in many medical studies and that the highly tattooed opinions of experts or specialists actually belong to the lower level of scientific ranking. Whether these opinions are expressed in the media, articles or, even, textbooks is irrelevant. This is useful information, especially for alternative-integrative field that is full of charismatic experts in Lyme, molds, autism, Bio-resonance testing, detoxes and whatever, whose approaches fail in practice. The last doubt in my mind about alternative hype, before studying scientific process on my own, was effectively extinguished by the two ‘holistic’ books which still remain popular and sell primitive treatments. Their author, Hulda Clark, ND, claiming no less than The Cure for All Diseases, and The Cure for All Cancers. Such books, claiming cures, solutions, revolutions, breakthrough or successful 5-7 etc, step programs to anything, from poor memory to hemorrhoids, are very common in health book market. The main lesson I have ever learned from such books is that paper is, indeed, the single most resilient material on Earth, due to its ability to withstand even the most glaring idiocies. As an example, none of the aforementioned ‘cure’ books contained even a single case of anything being cured. Ironically and sadly, but Dr. Clark, proved the real value of her preventive and actual treatment for cancer by dying from it, herself, at the age far below an average life span for a woman. I personally do welcome health books which cover healthy nutrition, exercise, body-mind and other subjects of general healthy hygiene. These are very useful, however whether their authors do not understand limits of these measures, or they try to oversell the message but too often true benefits of these measures are greatly exaggerated. One thing that it is important to wash hands with a soap before eating, but another is to portray this act as a cure and prevention of cancer, heart or any serious disease. I have seen plenty of even young people on perfect diets, rigorous exercise regiments, doing yoga and other healthy things to only fall apart and become invalids, overnight. It is not to discourage from these necessary healthy habits but to only note that an apple a day is far from enough to keep a doctor away.

Concerning scientific process, effective implementation of scientific findings in practice, in reality, is far more prone to failures than commonly assumed automatic success.

“Scientific truth has only a few ways to be expressed correctly, but there are thousands of ways to express it wrongly!
It is easy to take the wrong paths that are numerous,
and difficult to find the few right ones.”
Professor of physics, former MIT researcher,
and author of Schrodinger’s Universe and the Origin of
the Natural Laws, Milo Wolff PhD.
This is because the findings, on one hand, and choosing these for successful medical practice, on the other, belong to two entirely different sciences, operating by different rules and methods. The science that deals with establishing findings is basic research. Yet, its only purpose is to provide individual parts or options for science two, applied science, which attempts to construct or engineer these into successful technologies and scientific theories. Medicine has bundled certain findings in speculations, the best it could, to formally justify tests, treatments and products as scientific. Since all of us have been conditioned to associate science wit hits enormous success in computer, telecommunication, space exploration and other sound technologies this term continues to impress and instill hope in medicine even while it continues to fail to contain the epidemics of chronic diseases. This cover of ‘science’ and reliance on big name medical specialists must be the reason why our political leaders instead of holding special hearings to investigate this gigantic catastrophe and imposter of science keep supplying NIH with more billions of dollars for ‘more research’ which essentially gets dumped in a bonfire. By a comparison, even very rare mistakes in technologies, such as in the auto, or aviation industry trigger urgent congressional hearings. There, no one suggests more research to correct failures, but only to investigate the exact reasons for these. Why has the same not been carried out in medicine where human casualties exceed accidents in the technological sector by the millions?! Not only this complete lack of control over the disastrous quality of modern medicine costs millions of people poor quality of life due to suffering, side effects of drugs, and lives, too, but in addition, their hard earned money are thrown in the fire, in the name of science.

Obviously, the difference between successful science in technologies and failed science in medicine must lie in their respective rankings. Technological success is owed to high quality of precision and reliability in its based exact sciences such as physics, mathematics and chemistry, as these created a healthy bridge between basic research and applied science, that minimizes mistakes and maximizes success. In medicine this bridge does not even exist, instead is an abyss between the two that filled with speculations. An example of the real practical value of minimizing mistakes and quickly exposing empty speculations through exactness of math and reliable theories in physics, is evidenced in the 2nd law of thermodynamics in physics, where a single math formula deems impossible to engineer an everlasting machine, based on its own energy source. This saves from waste of time and funds on such senseless undertaking, even though research in the process would produce many formally legitimate scientific findings, as medicine has. Unfortunately, scientists admitted that math formulas cannot be applied to the human body because it is too complex or nonlinear. Without such, reliable theories and healthy bridge 99% of all treatments and research ended up engineering the equivalent of impossible everlasting machines, in medicine. However, even in exact sciences, nothing is given and “exact recipes for engineering do not exist as intelligent guess is always necessary” stated an expert in decision science, MIT physics professor, George E. Pugh, PhD. In the absence of healthy bridge for engineering, inexact sciences like psychology, social science, and medicine, are at the mercy of speculations or blind guesswork of choosing from millions of things to bundle something together, the best they can. Since random speculations have never belonged to high grade science, knowledgeable scientists such as Israeli-born, Cambridge University physics professor, David Deutsch, PhD referred to medicine as operating on rule of thumb and Soviet physicist Nobel laureate, Professor David Landau, PhD, called certain inexact sciences as senseless. Other physicists, as the two professors, in their book, Fashionable Nonsense, have exposed this generic Achilles heel in inexact sciences to fall for speculations. As an example, they intentionally fabricated a nonsense theory based on some formally scientific references that was published as a legitimate theory by a peer reviewed scientific journal. Fashionable nonsense flourishes in alternative-integrative medicine and because its speculative approaches keep failing they keep changing their fashions. Depending which one of these has a bigger mouth or pocket to market itself, that one becomes the next fashionable nonsense. Currently, the division of pharmaceutical fashionable nonsense, in alternative-integrative medicine, is headed by so called functional medicine, in energy medicine a fad, NAET. (A brief analysis of NAET as being harmful medical nonsense is presented in the video recording of the FCT seminar: The Extremely Complex Hidden Nature of Chronic Diseases and Proper Bio-Resonance Testing, as the only Key to Unlock These). These and thousand other fashionable nonsenses are easily implantable in this industry as it well exploits gullibility and absence of criteria of proper scientific scrutiny, among its practitioners. I know this first hand, as I used to fall for these speculations, myself, in the past too until I suspected a big rat in this field and started learning principles of real science. Moreover, besides all inexact sciences being vulnerable to speculations, even with the purest of motives, the reality is that, most of the time, these are motivated by pursuits of market control, prestige and profits.

As philosophers of science stated centuries ago, scientific knowledge poorly constructed resembles an impressive looking building without foundation, that is built to collapse, as these have been in medicine. Just recently American Journal of Medicine declared the collapse of even the very gold standard of medical practice – evidence-based medicine – that was based on thousands of positive studies, supposedly scientifically supporting its practice. Yet, its end result, in the actual medical practice, has rather been an outright evidence of failure. (AJM, Vol. 130, No. 11, Nov 2017). The problem with the ‘evidence’ is that these studies, as many in alternative medicine, were based on the flawed or artificial animal and human models of disease. These flaws consisted of mechanistic attachments of treatments, drugs, against some chosen abnormal findings in lab, or other tests which are commonly found under generic disease names or labels. These attachments along with the subsequent bookkeeping activity, statistics, made this process formally ‘scientific’, where bookkeeping established some formal superiority of drugs over placebos where the latter, logistically, are nothing or piece of dirt. As this ‘evidence’ over nothing has failed to produce what really counts—reversals of diseases—but only some temporary improvement in abnormal findings, it has ignored far deeper and more important sources of these findings and nature of disease. These are their very causes along with the individual state of each disease for each patient. The individual disease for each patient consists of genetic predisposition, different combinations of causes, individual sensitivity to these, a number and exact identity of all malfunctioned organs, besides just those detected by limited lab and other tests, as well as the differences in lifestyle and environment, from person to person. The end result, apples — drugs — which were used to establish some bookkeeping ‘evidence’ in the studies, ended up treating oranges, essentially different diseases in the real life.

No wonder “magnificent buildings” keep collapsing and the hundreds of billions of dollars, combined, spent by NIH and other parties, over the years, on medical research have largely produced only piles of papers of unknown value with NIH seeking some other sciences to explain this global failure. This statement by Columbia University Professor Stuart Firestein, PhD, speaks exactly of a real scientific value of these papers that no one really knows what to do with, due to an absence of a healthy bridge to intelligently connect any of these. “Even papers in immunology or cell biology mystify me — and so do some papers in my own field, neurobiology. Every day my expertise seems to get narrower. So scientists have had to fall back on another strategy for coping with the mountain of information: we largely ignore it… But if scientists would talk about the questions rather than boring your eyes out of their sockets with reams of jargon, and if the media reported not only on new discoveries but the questions they answered and the new puzzles they created, and if educators stopped trafficking in facts that are already available on Wikipedia—then we might find a public once again engaged in this great adventure, science, that has been going on for the past 15 generations.” (Scientific American, April 2012).

Speaking of the media, if it had ever bothered following through on all of its initially reported hyped ‘promising’ medical discoveries, it would have also reported that virtually none of these has gotten beyond this point.

Likewise, ‘promising’ basic cancer research, among other specialties, that has costed taxpayers mega billions defines its real worth too. “The terabytes of data produced by cancer research could be too much of a good thing until we figure out better ways to manage the information.” (Nature, Vol. 509, May 29, 2014). Alternative-integrative medicine is just as unable to manage its own information and apples to treat oranges.
3. A scientific impossibility for medical speculations to succeed under the current paradigms

“The problem lies not in the intentions, nor in the dedication of individuals, but as so often in the history of science, from a limitation in the prevailing paradigm or model that governs and limits thinking in any given era.”
Thomas Kuhn, PhD (Physics), Professor, Philosophy of Science*, author: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, recognized as one of the most significant books in science of the 20th century.
*One of the main goals of philosophy of science is to protect science from scientists.

“Governs and limits thinking” stresses that if a paradigm or model that serves the role of computer software to solve a certain problem was not programed with the necessary important knowledge to accomplish this it can’t be squeezed out of it.

To realize the real odds for speculations to succeed under the current limited conventional and alternative paradigms, Thomas Edison, when engineering a simple working light bulb, faced 125 million wrong combinations in choosing just 5 correct materials out of only 100 (basic research). What are the odds of choosing the right combination in what and how to treat chronic diseases when the pieces to choose from are in the hundreds of thousands, combined? These pieces are: internal organs and tissues (hundreds), abnormal test findings (thousands), potential causative agents, such as environmental pollutants (hundred thousands), infectious agents (hundreds, most common), noxious dietary and substance abuse agents (dozens), side effects of medical products and treatments (thousands), treatment options such as drugs, nutritional supplements, herbs, chelators, ‘detoxifiers’, oxygenative ‘binders’, homeopathics, acupuncture and other energetic interventions, including electrocutions and something ‘quantum,’ (thousands). Such a number can’t be fathomed and just settling for something astronomical, beyond trillions, is sufficient to realize an impossibility for speculations to succeed without exact measurements or diagnostic tools and reliable scientific theory which can establish a correct treatment. Without these, such an endless number of options only invites endless speculations and activities, particularly in alternative-integrative medicine where the criteria for proper scrutiny either for their inventors or practitioners do not exist.The similar mathematical impossibility to arrive to anything concrete with the prevailing diagnostic methods when the odds are astronomical was reached by the aforementioned Harvard autism researcher, Dr. Herbert when she calculated that to screen only three thousand out of 100 thousand chemicals in our daily environment for all possible neurotoxic combinations would require 85 billion lab tests.

To realize the futility of conquering chronic diseases without properly diagnosing and removing their causes one is to view causes as virtual bullets lodged in the different organs through which they have initiated and continue to advance disease. Obviously, for as long as bullets remain unextracted by treatments, disease and more diseases, in the future, have the only course — to advance. This has been exactly the case because conventional and alternative lab methods are incapable of diagnosing causes of chronic diseases, toxicological agents or environmental pollutants where it counts the most—inside the internal organs. The same methods often miss chronic infections such as Lyme and co-infections, herpes, Epstein Barr and other viruses, parasitic, fungal and other infections which always play a significant role in all chronic diseases. These severe diagnostic limitations doom both medicines on pulling at straws, facing trillions of options with anything having something to do with disease or ‘better’ health. Since there are so many factors that appear having something to do with disease and its tests and treatments, this made it impossible for even a medically illiterate person to offer something which would not make some sense, in the alternative market. As the result, anything goes.
Both medicines are dead-ended but the show must go on.
John Ioannidis, MD, Professor of Medicine and Director of the Stanford Prevention Research Center at Stanford University School of Medicine. (An Epidemic of False Claims. Scientific American. June 1, 2001.)

“The problem begins with the public’s rising expectations of science. Being human scientists are tempted to show that they know more than they do. Emphasis is often given to single studies instead of the big picture… The ability to prove something false continues to be a hallmark of science. But scientists need to improve the way they do their research and how they disseminate evidence… Eventually findings that bear on treatment decisions and policies should come with a disclosure of any uncertainty that surrounds them. It is fully acceptable for patients and physicians to follow a treatment based on information that has, say, only a 1 percent chance of being correct. But we must be realistic about the odds.”

Certainly, “to follow a treatment based on information… only a 1 percent chance of being correct” does not speak very highly for such treatments. In conventional medicine, such disclosures are made rarely, in alternative-integrative industry never which, quoting Charles Darwin remarking on certain scientists, keeps “preaching ignorance with confident face.”

A recent book, Snowball in a Blizzard, A Physician’s Notes on Uncertainty in Medicine, authored by a medical school faculty member, delivers the same point of the poor quality of conventional and alternative medicines, due to their practitioners practicing blindly. (Steven Hatch, MD, Basic Books, 2016).

While, to its credit, conventional medicine tends to follow certain rules of science by, at least, acknowledging failures and attempting to minimize speculations, the alternative-integrative medical industry, short of medical school faculty members and peer-reviewed journals, follows no rules. Making irresponsible claims, referring to some low meaning or outright mickey-mouse research and, even lying in order to retail senseless products, treatments and services is the leading strategy. Its only credit is that it considers more possible causes of chronic diseases than conventional medicine does, with some of these being important. Yet, it can neither differentiate their relative importance nor properly diagnose and treat them. Even when, among these causes, it attempts to treat usually ignored by conventional doctors, mercury toxicity, parasitic, fungal, or overlooked Lyme infections it falls in the same trap, as pharmaceutical drugs, with only different apples treating oranges, since there is only individual for each patient mercury toxicity, chronic infection and thousand other problems. That is why this industry keeps failing too and feeding its practitioners and patients with more medical tricks under its long sleeve. To the credit of the highest office of the US healthcare system, the National Institutes of Health it, following a century of failed attempts and wasted hundreds of billions of the tax payers’ dollars on ‘more research’, finally realized that the fundamental reason for failure is the missing bridge between basic research and applied science. In an attempt to solve this it advanced a Translational Research or Road Map Initiative in 2005, that seeks to finally translate millions of accrued findings of basic medical research into, productive medical practice to prevent and reverse chronic diseases. Yet, they also realized that the task is so daunting that they hope that some other sciences would come to rescue. But the sinister conundrum is that due to the aforementioned lack of proper education in physics and other important sciences, they don’t know which sciences. Besides, the sound goal of finding that translational bridge faces another conundrum with the current medical paradigm because the only way to arrive at successful translational research is by establishing, first, the primary nature and targets of chronic diseases to treat. However, this can only be established through a different paradigm, based on controlled energy medicine with capable Bio-resonance testing and causative homeopathy evolved by FCT. Only through consistent reversals of chronic diseases, as demonstrated by FCT one can be highly certain about both main causes and nature of chronic diseases. No matter what research discovers but without achieving actual solution—reversal of diseases—that establishes a sound model or nature of disease, along with capable diagnostic and therapeutic methods which have achieved success, one cannot determine the real importance of research findings. Short of this, research just keeps pulling at straws and throwing most of the grants in a fire. Due to the aforementioned conundrum, at the time of creation of this page, or 13 years after, the NIH initiative has made zero progress.

The highest medical body of alternative-integrative medicine, the Office of Alternative and Integrative Medicine under NIH, has admitted to its own failure too, as stated by its Director, Josephine Briggs, MD, PhD, concerning the lack of evidence of efficacy of these treatments in chronic diseases (Boston Globe, November 2014). It does not know how to overcome this, either.

But there is another large industry which must be mentioned and warned of, as it also misleads its supporters and contributes to this waste of resources and hopes, due to the lack of a healthy bridge. This industry consists of countless disease foundations supported by desperate patients, good-hearted people and well-meant philanthropies.
Do disease foundations* educate or exploit their followers?

*Disease foundations are different from benevolent philanthropies such as Linda and Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Warren Buffet and others, alike.

I, and as many people still do, used to support in the past certain disease foundations, especially on cancer and children related research, because of the publicized noble goals to find cures through sponsoring more research. Disease foundations inspire their followers to donate by promising educational services regarding ‘best’ treatments, ‘promising’ research and impressing with their advisory boards full of big name scientists. However, the more I learned about the muddy waters and the business side of medicine and its research industry with their virtual obsession to find cures only through costly drugs, the more it was becoming clear that such cures, short of rare exceptions, are impossible. Furthermore, books: On the Take, Overdosed America, How We Do Harm, published by respectable conventional academicians, and other media made it abundantly clear that ‘education’ of patients through disease foundations, and of practitioners through professional associations and academies, from pediatrics to geriatrics, served more the interests of these organizations and their business liaisons than real education. At the core of this mass deceit lies the same, very low grade of medicine as science that just exploits hopes with no sound theory in place to discern this. How could possibly ‘best’ treatments, ‘promising’ research and big name scientists on the advisory boards make much of a difference when all of these have already failed to cure, virtually, a single ‘chronic’ disease, in real life? Another common trap for many people is in having higher hopes for those disease foundations which were established by patients or their family members and, particularly, if these are also open to ‘innovative’ approaches of alternative-integrative medicine to find cures. However, as stated by Professor Kuhn, science has never found dedication of individuals, foundation founders in this case, to be sufficient to overcome limitations of prevailing paradigms or simply speaking scientific solutions cannot be bought by just raising and spending money, by foundations or anyone else. The fact remains that all of the researchers whom foundations sponsor have been trained in mechanistic chemical pharmaceutical research in “dead matter” that can only produce to sell more of the aforementioned apples, drugs, to treat oranges. Further on this page, an exposure of a common deceit of innovative treatments in medicine by a Nobel Laureate in medicine. This is particularly the case in alternative-integrative medicine that plays by no rules. A concrete example, a new patient and another victim of these ‘innovative’ treatments for Lyme disease, in this case, shared the following. Apparently the ‘Lyme literate specialist’ Richard Horowitz MD, whose first book, “Solving the Mystery of Lyme and Chronic Disease” I criticized on Amazon for promoting incapable and harmful treatments, apparently wrote a ‘revelation part two’, another hyped book on the subject. According to this patient, his case was used as one of the ‘success’ cases, in both books. However, the truth is this patient questioned directly the doctor as to when he will, finally, experience success of this treatment. He never did and his real story is one of a real horror, than success. Besides him being very sick, to begin with, these treatments added to the damage where he is unable to control his 24/7 pain with opioids and remains an invalid. Another former patient of the ‘specialist’, who I saw recently in my office and whose ‘success’ story was not mentioned in the book, shared that following his special Lyme treatment with a slew of antibiotics, she turned yellow, collapsed and had to discontinue this torture. I have met in my office many similar victims of ‘innovative’ treatments of ‘Lyme specialists’ in some ‘progressive’ clinic in Florida, New York and all over the country. However, deceit of these books and clinics may not be even intentional, but even worse due to a blatant ignorance in medicine and science of these and other ‘innovators’ as they, likely, don’t even know a definition of cure or solution. Many of these ‘Lyme, autism’ and other ‘clinics’ and ‘centers’ proclaim cure when a patient felt better only for a few days, while still propped up by a slew of drugs and ‘natural’ pills. A former CEO of one of the Fortune 500 companies, who knows a few things about deceitful marketing, shared with me that he was surprised when a ‘progressive clinic’ was filming testimonials of ‘cured’ Lyme patients who were still hooked to intravenous bags with drugs.

An autism foundation, established by the parents of autistic child, promotes treatments which are administered by DAN (or whatever their name is, today) ‘specialists’, following which I have seen a number of children becoming severely damaged. Both email and certified return receipt letter to the training facility — Autism Research Institute — offering them my explanations for these damages and far more effective, much less costly FCT approach, remained ignored.

All in all, disease foundations, including those which promote ‘innovative’ treatments, have become a part of this bottomless money pit of wasted donations which are spent on their payrolls and senseless research. Even a gigantic 1.3 billion dollar sum couldn’t buy better research and went to waste by the European Union, lately. This humble statement of the lead scientist, world-renowned Israeli brain researcher, Professor Henry Markram, MD, of this just recently failed project, delivers the same message: “…although researchers worldwide are publishing tens of thousands of neuroscience studies every year, neither our understanding of basic brain functions nor our ability to treat brain disorders seemed to be progressing much.” (Trouble in Mind: Two Years In, a $1-billion-plus effort to simulate the human brain is in disarray. Was it poor management, or is something fundamentally wrong with Big Science? Scientific American, October 2015). Scientific American is a science savvy publication which correctly goes to the core of the problem, the fundamentals or the very DNA of our medical science, it is, point blank, poor and primitive. Look at the foundation Autism Speaks, established by the family of an autistic child. Where would they and other foundations get better researchers from? After collecting and wasting hundreds of millions of dollars, over the years, conducting impressive PR campaigns and milking good-hearted NBA players and corporations, the foundation has accomplished nothing. Am I the only ‘cynic’? Read this: “Since 2005, Autism Speaks has raised and spent more than half a billion dollars, and they have nothing to show for it. We still don’t know what causes autism, we have no treatments, we have no cure, and we still don’t even know how many people have it, nor do we have any accepted biological markers. Children today are just as likely to develop autism as they were $500,000 million dollars ago. They’ve saved no one”. (http://www.ageofautism.com/2016/07/dr-rob-ring-and-what-went-wrong-at-autism-speaks-everything.html).

A medical school faculty member and former editor of the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA), Lester S. King MD, pointed too that philanthropies, as disease foundations, can’t accomplish anything either by sponsoring incapable medicine. (Medical Thinking, Princeton University Press, 1982). When I tried to share my successful yet simple non-pharmaceutical FCT approach with one of the famous brain researchers, on Autism Speaks’ advisory board, whose son remained autistic, I never heard from him. The problem isn’t just with this foundation, but all of them because they have no place to go but hiring researchers all of whom have failed to solve chronic diseases in their corresponding specialties. Because they were trained to research apples to treat oranges. After realizing this I stated, years ago, in one of my articles on Lyme disease, that millions of dollars donated with much fanfare by some Connecticut Lyme Foundation to a famous Lyme researcher at a prestigious university center in NYC, was a waste. Also, from my long successful experience in determining and treating the real underlying causes of chronic Lyme disease, I knew that the Lyme bacteria was not a primary cause of the disease, but only the tip of the proverbial iceberg. The following years have confirmed that millions have been wasted and research has produced nothing. This email testifies where Lyme disease is really at, these days:

Get Savely Yurkovsky – FCT® – Field Control Therapy download

—–Original Message—–
From: Elaine…@comcast.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 12:05 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FCT Field Control Therapy Contact: Mold exposure &Lyme

Message:
I was wondering if you could help me. I’ve been sick (for) 30 yrs. have gone everywhere spending thousands of dollars. I heard you were very good.

For decades, based on Bio-resonance testing and the principle, “body can’t lie”, FCT warned of the significant harm of antibiotics and compared their use in chronic infections to an illusion of getting ahead by paying a mortgage with negative amortization, where the actual debt keeps rising. Finally, a number of accomplished infectious disease specialists have issued the same warning. In his recent book, Missing Microbes How The Overuse of Antibiotics is Fueling Our Modern Plagues, NYU professor and former president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, Martin J. Blaser, MD presented dozens of detrimental effects of antibiotics, including cancer and death. How can these ‘innovative progressive Lyme specialists’ produce cures while poisoning their patients with gigantic doses of such harmful substances over lengthy periods of time?! What it really produces is permanent harm, including mutated antibiotic resistant and more aggressive Lyme and other infections, unless undone by FCT. Even in the rare responders, a few lucky, genetically robust patients, the next tick bite starts the cycle over, as these treatments do not render any better, and if anything, only a lower resistance to infections. I recommend you read Dr. Blaser’s book.

My proposal to the aforementioned famous researcher about a far more effective, less costly and antibiotic-free FCT approach to Lyme disease, based on physics of Bio-resonance testing and novel homeopathic method, fell on deaf ears, as usual. Besides the fact that physics to pharmaceutically programmed minds remains as confounding as the difference between a string theory and violins, the real tragedy of our medicine and all of its victims is that there is no money in homeopathy or energized water. Underneath of all this impressive phraseology, ‘research’ and ‘search for cure’ in reality there is only search for new patented drugs to generate more profits, where the researchers and their universities seek their share of. Who needs cures from some energized water?! Wake up, medicine is just another market place. As Columbia University scientist, Martin Blank PhD stated true, dedicated scientists are endangered species, our days, because if their work threatens big money behind a mainstream science their research work will be placed in a choke mode, by cutting off research grants. No less than the former president of Harvard University, Professor Derek Bok, PhD, in his book, Universities in the Market Place, among other sources, noted that researchers and their research centers, particularly in medicine, want solutions which can generate high revenues for them. And for this one cannot find a better partner than a Daddy with deep pockets, the one who has corrupted and destroyed the quality of medical education – the pharmaceutical industry. It has invaded just about all of the major professional associations and academies as well as disease foundations. Foundations and the majority of professional associations who are open to alternative-integrative medicine have their own Daddies, too – vendors and sponsors − who market through them senseless tests, pills, supplements, machinery, you name it, using their conventions and media. One look at these vendors and sponsors makes it obvious to a reasonably educated eye that this is no longer science or medicine, but Mark Twain’s: “First came the miners, then came the whores”. Concerning my aforementioned critique on Amazon in April of 2015 of the book “Solving the Mystery of Lyme and Chronic Disease”, and statement that such treatments can ‘succeed’ in only making this disease worse. The author did not contest my critique, he couldn’t, and just to show you how biased I really am, a month later at Lyme Connection Foundation meeting that marched him in as Lyme’s messiah, he admitted this, himself. As expected the lobby area at the meeting was covered with ‘whores,’ vendors preying on the desperate by peddling you name it ‘cures for Lyme’. My written question to the messiah asking him to respond to my critique of his method was silenced with smiles by the foundation’s president and messiah, raising a question, who exactly is the president and this foundation serving? But, suddenly, my bad image of a party spoiler was rescued by one of the victims of these ‘special treatments’, promoted by this and other Lyme foundations. This patient asked the right question: “Can your approach cure Lyme disease?” To this the messiah issued the honest answer, “No”. Needless to say, this foundation had rejected my proposal to present FCT’s simple, energetic approach which cures Lyme without toxic antibiotics, ‘natural’ pills and electrocutions. Usually, FCT proposals get rejected partly because of the priorities of whoring business that many organizations have with the vendors, whom FCT threatens, and partly because the management of the majority of foundations is incompetent in both science and medicine. Occasionally, with an exception to this rule as when Massachusetts Lyme foundation did give me an opportunity to present my approach at their September 2017 meeting, even if in only a small, not the main auditorium, the finale restored the truth. Even as my presentation was supported by a live testimonial of a cured patient of mine who had not responded to antibiotics and other kitchen sinks of Lyme ‘literate’ doctors’, yet, following my presentation, I was immediately removed from the speakers question-answer session to be held at the main auditorium. Obviously, my pill-free approach must have threatened both the small army of their vendors and ‘Lyme specialists’ present there.

If one picture is worth a thousand words, these illustrations offer a comparison between the number of tests and treatments offered by ‘Lyme literate specialists’, with the related sponsoring and vendoring activities, on one hand, and FCT on the other.
Pharmaceutical drugs: numerous antibiotics in the dozens intravenous and oral including fluoroquinolone antibiotics which often cause life-long crippling disabilities, anti-tuberculin, antimalarials, anti-inflammatory, pain killers, immune modulators, tranquilizers for anxiety or insomnia, antidepressants, amphetamines, multiple hormones and their manipulator drugs for conversion or stimulation, antifungal, anti-parasitic, antiviral, anti-histamines, mood elevators and stabilizers, anticonvulsants, intravenous immunoglobulins, blood pressure lowering and raising agents, muscle relaxants, heavy metal chelators – injectable, oral and suppositories.Supplements
Herbs to kill Lyme and co-infections, candidiasis, parasites, for liver cleansing, sedation, pain, anti-inflammatory, Herxheimer reaction, other.
Vitamins: B family, oral and injectable, E, D, K.
Minerals and trace elements: calcium, magnesium, zinc, selenium, chromium, other.
Other supplements to allegedly: improve digestion, heal the gut, immunity, repair mitochondria, and cell membrane, to decrease and protect from oxidative damage, detoxify, alter body pH. These are: Alpha-lipoic acid, glutathione, acetyl-L-carnitine, Resveratrol, co-enzyme Q-10, NADH, glutamine, glycine, sodium sulfate, inulin, arabinogalactans, DGL (D-glycerinated licorice) with aloe vera, n-acetyl cysteine, fish oils, antioxidants. NT factor, Alka-Seltzer Gold, lymphatic drainage remedies – Itires, Pekana, SY Detox, NAC, LDN, beta-cryptoxanthin, OptiCleanse GHI, by Xymogen, with flaxseed complex – alpha linoleic acid, betaine hydrochloric acid, quercetin, potassium D-glucarate, turmeric, NAC, ginger, watercress powder, green tea extract with L-glutamine, medium chain triglycerides.
Other treatments: Physical therapy, acupuncture, massage, lymphatic massage, meditation, yoga, Tai-Chi, homeopathic products, elimination and rotation diets.

All these tests and treatments are the classic of shooting in the dark, where the last one understands the nature of disease the more inventory one needs to attempt to overcome the impossible, to defeat it.
Main Diagnostic tests utilized by FCT
Bio-resonance testing
Basic blood count and chemistry
Rarely other tests may be requested
Main Interventions utilized by FCT
Causative and restorative homeopathy
Healthy balanced diet
Addressing EMFs
As needed: glandulars and probiotics

The difference between the pharmaceutical warehouses of ‘Lyme specialists’ and FCT can be gathered from a testimonial of a patient who remained an invalid following the former and was cured by FCT. You may view it on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utdJxElmIwc.

My several communications to another Lyme ‘educational’ foundation, The Lyme Times, questioning them on why they allow these ‘literate’ Lyme charlatans and pill companies to prey on their members – patients − were left without a response.

Another example of medical ignorance and exploitation by disease foundations is a foundation established by the mother of an autistic boy, based on an ignorant speculation that autism is caused by congenital Lyme disease! With zero proof of this or cured children, the foundation has procured business for itself through public presentations filled with vendors and alternative-integrative charlatans who, in their turn, generate business by poisoning these poor children with unnecessary toxic antibiotics, chelation and vitamins. One can gather the real benefits of such ‘education’ and ‘treatments for congenital Lyme disease’ and how children, in general, are being also a part of this global medical blood bath, through this email:

From: …… [mailto:contact@…….com]
Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 12:13 PM
To:[email protected]
Subject: Please send a referral for our young son, we live in the greater Los Angeles area
Hello,
We need help! We have been trying to help our son who is 10 for 10 years to heal with his many challenges, including congenital Lyme. We have been to dozens upon dozens of practitioners and he is still unimproved.
Can you refer to a practitioner trained in your technique near our home please. We live in Pasadena California.
Thank you kindly

The bottom line, crippled paradigms cannot buy solutions no matter who and how much pays, where a majority of disease foundations have become just another, to quote Warren Buffet referencing the pharmaceutical industry, “tapeworm on the body of our healthcare”. The fundamental problem and very source of tapeworm is not so much the cost of its drugs, but that the chemical mechanistic paradigm has forced our and the world’s healthcare into their necessity as well as other unproductive costly medical services. This can be overcome only through education of physicians in the different, far more effective and less costly medicine, that is based on relevant interdisciplinary sciences, which are still sought by NIH. This is a mammoth work that will require both extensive resources and man power. I have established a Foundation of Integrative Sciences in Medicine Inc., to accomplish this goal. If you wish or know others who can help and get involved, its website: www.foisim.org. Note: vendors need not to contact.
4. The enormous profits which reward the medical industries for failures.

“We know more and more about less and less and
science has become our enemy, instead of a friend.”
Two-time nominee for the Nobel prize in Medicine,
Professor Robert Becker, MD.

As if failures weren’t enough of a curse in the first place, yet these, in addition, become rewarded. The conventional medical industry generates trillions of dollars annually for its activities and the alternative-integrative some 100 billion. The revenues rise through more exponentially: ‘better’ drugs and new costly services and research, in conventional industry. In alternative-integrative industry through ‘natural’ products, gadgets, services, ‘educational’ events, some programs, fellowships, or just ‘how to’ pep talks. The main milk cow for both industries is the retail approach to healthcare where treatments are not tailored to each individual patient’s disease but attached to a generic disease label: ‘allergy’, fibromyalgia, ‘autism’, ‘Lyme’, arthritis, ‘heart disease’, ‘tumor’, hypertension, and so on. This accomplishes the retailers’ dream, to treat people as uniform herds with the ‘same’ disease, but not people themselves with their actual individual diseases. Back to apples and oranges, where the ‘blizzard’ makes it easy to sell snow to Eskimos, by anyone. Here, some formal scientific references to anything: cholesterol, inflammation, bad gene methylation, antioxidants, mercury, mycotoxins, parasites, brain neurotransmitters with the list being endless, move merchandise ‘scientifically’ by selling drugs and natural fads, from conventional medical study established that the only difference between the ‘new better’ drugs on one hand, and old ones on the other, was higher price for the former but none in the quality of care. In alternative medicine, no one even bothers to find out anything concerning the real worth of treatments, anything goes. The industry fools its practitioners and the public with hype akin to ‘sailors do it better’, selling them piles of ‘natural’ goods, thank God no one really knows how to scrutinize these claims. These piles make the alternative-integrative industry far more deceptive than conventional, because such a great number of hyped treatments, tests and products, without rigorous scientific standards and exact measuring tools (e.g., the impossibility of knowing if disease, A, is being actually reversed by a product or a treatment, B, inside the body) keep instilling hopes of “what if it works?” However hope is not a scientific entity, scrutiny is, but which does not exist for this industry. While the industry and its entrepreneurial doctors retail their esoteric stockpiles of tests, treatments, and products as something ‘progressive’, ‘innovative’ and powerful, their actual origin is just the opposite − weakness, ineptitude and redressed failure − because if something really worked, as FCT does with only one approach, why would one need so many tests and treatments? Just look at what one cruise missile can do these days that thousands of bombers couldn’t in the past.

Nobel laureate in medicine, Professor Joshua Lederberg, PhD

Nobel laureate in medicine, Professor Joshua Lederberg, PhD, has offered a realistic view concerning the true worth of innovations in medicine: “the true value of innovations lies in their utilization” or actual benefit to their consumers, people; otherwise, it is just a marketing hype. (Innovations vs Hype, Scientific American, Custom Media, Jan. 2014). These quotes of the medical practitioners themselves express, better than I, the real value of medical ‘innovations’ and ‘progress’, which only progress lie in progression of profits and costs. On the conventional side: “Who among us has not repeatedly seen claims of fourth-generation drugs with no side-effects, new operations that yield glowing results with minimal complications, or the latest infallible, high-tech diagnostic procedure only to discover months or years later that these claims missed the truth by miles?” (“A Piece of My Mind,” Journal of the American Medical Association, February 27, 1991). On the alternative side: “I have been in practice for 15 years now and have assembled quite a lot of technology. I started with classical homeopathy but realized its limitations. Along the way, I have been through VEGA, Kirlian, EAV, IV’s including chelation, DMPS, hydrogen peroxide, hydrochloric acid and the usual vitamin-mineral protocols. Also, neural therapy, dark field microscopy, biological terrain assessment and complex homeopathy. I can see an upgrade on the horizon, but, I am tired of running after all these things. I feel that my concept of ‘underlying causes’ needs to make a shift into a different level.” (AH ND.) You may add to these the rest of alternative-integrative tests and treatments. Yet, if you search any of these on the internet, you will be impressed by their marketing hype, quoting a disenchanted integrative MD, “as the best thing since sliced bread.”

In light of the unsubstantiated claims of the alternative-integrative industry, one has to agree with the former editors of the New England Journal of Medicine that alternative medicine is to stop having a free ride with its claims but be subjected to the same scrutiny as conventional medicine. (Alternative Medicine – The Risks of Untested and Unregulated Remedies, NEJM, Sept. 1998, Vol. 339, #12). So, the next time you see an ‘integrative’ or ‘holistic’ center or doctor proudly offering so many esoteric tests and treatments, keep in mind their real origin. On the whole, the real victims of all of this are patients who are misled into thinking that these and other ‘innovations’ in this industry represent something progressive, and that the practitioners who use these are on some cutting edge.
5. The industries block superior medical approaches for the fear of losing market control.

In the aforementioned book, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Professor Kuhn emphasized that all decisions in science and its practice are dictated and constrained by the chosen paradigms or general approaches of scientists. A paradigm can be likened to problem-solving computer software where no scientist, or health practitioner is able to squeeze something out of the software that it was not programmed for. The more the software is familiar with the basic principles of solving problems, by using relevant sciences and medical approaches, the more capable is the paradigm to cure, substantially reverse, or halt disease, depending on its stage. While scientists generally knew about capable and incapable paradigms, what actually made this book so famous was the revelation that scientists much favor scientific revolutions which do not threaten them personally, through demotion of their paradigms. Obviously, the reasons are not scientific but selfish because through paradigms they sustain their self-worth, authority, control, research grants and income. As the consequence, if more progressive but unfamiliar to their training and skills paradigms emerge, they usually ignore or block these, and continue indoctrinating their students and followers with an inferior one. Since a complex nature of any challenging problem has thousands of facts to choose from, they would continue emphasizing only the positives about those ones which sustain their paradigm, while ignoring and silencing their flaws, and conflicts with other important knowledge. Such scientists, whom Einstein deemed utilitarians and prevailing, Professor Kuhn named “normal scientists,” because they are both common and not true scientists. Medicine, which has become a trillion dollar apple pie, fosters “normal scientists” more than any other science, because if in a technology market the price to pay for products of outdated paradigms is going out of business, in conventional and alternative medicines these are rewarded through even more business, since failures dictate more ‘new’ treatments and research. A few examples. The several large studies demonstrated evidence of harm of vitamins to humans as they developed higher rates of heart disease, cancer and, even, mortality than nonconsumers. Yet we have never heard of alternative practitioners, vitamin companies and ‘health educators’ ceasing to distribute and promote these products or mentioning these studies. If anything, ‘better vitamins’ keep flooding the market. Likewise, several large studies in conventional medicine have demonstrated lack of benefit but only harm from prolonged antibiotic treatments in chronic Lyme disease. However, ‘Lyme literate’ and other ‘integrative Lyme specialists’ still administer these poisons to these patients where increasing the courses and number of antibiotics have only increased their side effects.

One of many examples, I have recently seen a girl who following eight months of intravenous antibiotics for Lyme disease, still had Lyme disease plus severe gastrointestinal side effects.

Homeopathy, for centuries, has been producing dramatic conflicting observations in relation to chemical-pharmaceutical paradigm, both conventional and ‘natural’. How many “normal scientists” in conventional medicine have bothered to analyze these observations pointing to the deeper workings of the human body and an entirely new medical paradigm? The great majority of them, including those who control medical journals, still ignore and block the important observations and knowledge from medical doctors whom they, allegedly, ‘educate’.

The concrete case, here, involves several conventional medical peer-reviewed journals refusing to publish an astonishing study demonstrating the spectacular success of a homeopathic vaccine (homeoprophylaxis) against the deadly infection of leptospirosis, on as many as 2.4 million people in Cuba! The homeopathic leptospirosis vaccine was 10 times cheaper than conventional vaccine and, even, demonstrated a slight superior reduction in mortality and morbidity rates, over conventional one. Obviously, the main reason for the study was that ‘primitive’ Cuban government and scientists, unlike their ‘advanced’ American counterparts, did not have billions of dollars to feed the bonfire. The study was conducted by the Cuban equivalent of our NIH, involving conventional medical specialists in infectious diseases, immunology and other specialties. Below is the correspondence between Gustavo Bracho, MD, the lead author of that study, and myself.

Dr. Savely Yurkovsky, MD
Enviado el: miercoles, 22 de diciembre de 2010 20:28
Para: [email protected]
Asunto: Leptospirosis Study
Dear Dr.Bracho –
Congratulations on your homeoprophylaxis with Leptospirosis study. It has a great significance for medicine. I am writing a chapter on homeopathy for the Textbook of Integrative Gastroenterology where I am including the reference to your study. My question to you is: Due to the significance of this study, did you try to publish it in mainstream medical peer-reviewed journals and, if yes, was it rejected for publication?
Thank you in advance for the courtesy of your reply.
With happy holidays,
Savely Yurkovsky, MD

From: Gustavo Bracho [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 6:40 AM
To: Savely Yurkovsky, MD
Subject: RE: Leptospirosis study
Dear Dr. Savely Yurkovsky,
Thank you very much for your message. The answer to your questions is yes. We tried to publish in 3 mainstream peer-review journals on the field of epidemiology, medicine and prevention. All of them rejected the article arguing singular reasons. None of the reasons were based on scientific criticisms. I can mention: “not appropriated for the audience of the journal”, “the scope suitable for higher rate journal” and a request to send the informed consent of all the 2.4 million persons involved in the intervention resulting in “lacking of appropriated evidence of meeting the ethic issues from the Helsinki declaration for clinical trials”. After a year and half trying to get it published we decided to submit the manuscript to Homeopathy journal who finally published the article in June this year. (Homeopathy (2010) 99, 156-166). I hope this answers your question.
Please do not hesitate to contact me for any further information.
Happy Christmas,
Dr. Gustavo Bracho
Finlay Institute
Havana City, CUBA

The refusal to publish this study, which was unique in its human enrollment size and scientific significance, just due to the lack of signed consents is as ‘logical’ as to accuse a doctor of saving someone’s life through a superior CPR method, for not obtaining a prior signed consent from the dying person. The ‘normal scientists’ of those journals, who rejected this publication concealed the great value of such simple, inexpensive and effective energetic approach to health care, have obviously done this for purely selfish reasons. Because this approach:

is foreign to their field of professional expertise and skills

would threaten their level of importance and personal control through downgrading these

threatens the medical and scientific monopoly of their chemical-pharmaceutical paradigm because it presents it with a real scientific blow, known as a conflict, where humans respond so well to programmed signals in ordinary inexpensive water.

Similarly, just a few years before this groundbreaking Cuban study my presentation of the same method at the annual Bio-terrorism 2005 conference: “Unified Science & Technology for Reducing Biological Threats & Countering Terrorism”, with affiliation to the Homeland Security Office, hit the same wall. This was in spite of my presenting many scientific references in support, as listed in my book, Biological, Chemical and Nuclear Warfare… The Power of Digital Medicine, for the use in acute emergencies, even by lay people. The conference chairman just labeled these all, as usual, “bad science,” without citing a single scientific argument why it was so “bad”. Ironically, but only two years after the Cuban scientists have initiated that successful leptospirosis study with energetically programmed water, based on ‘bad’ science!

Certainly such biased rejections continue to sustain this oxymoronic vicious cycle, whereby homeopathy remains just an ‘overdiluted unscientific water placebo’ which “we can’t accept, because there are no good published studies to validate it.” Yet when such studies or proposals for these are presented, they are rejected. A clever strategy like this can’t be beat. This bias in publication was reflected by Georgetown University Medical School Professor Wayne Jonas, MD, among other reputable scientists.

While Harvard medical school academicians have admitted that the practice of conventional medicine is based on a grossly outdated medical paradigm, inferior view of the nature and approach to disease, dating back to the 19th century (Albert-Laszlo, et al. Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. January 2011, Vol 12. www.nature.com/reviews/genetics), the “normal scientists” who run our healthcare systems do their best to keep it that way.

The alternative-integrative industry, with its ‘natural’ pharmaceuticals, practices the same outdated medicine but only with different pills, and its energy medicine, treatments fare just as poorly, because of being unable to properly treat what counts the most − the main causes of chronic diseases.

Alternative-integrative industry has plenty of “normal scientists”, too. That is why when they are presented with something like FCT which, like a cruise missile, replaces the great majority of ineffective medical bombers, they block it out. Years back, upon the recommendation of the president of a major professional organization for training MDs in alternative therapies, who was familiar with my work, I submitted a proposal to its education committee to present FCT at its next meeting. Yet, it was rejected since FCT is a big threat to its training in different approaches and ‘natural’ pharmaceuticals, as well as its vendors and sponsors, all of which this organization derives revenues. My article, Chelators of Mercury, Lead, and Other Heavy Metals: Theoretical Benefits, Suboptimal Results and Real Dangers – The Implications for Autism and Other Brain- and Somatic Diseases, supported by patient cases and scientific references, confirming the ineffectiveness and harm of chelators and how FCT safely addresses this important problem, was rejected for publication by the two alternative medical peer reviewed journals. Not surprisingly, the editorial staff of these journals, integrative doctors, were running chelation−mills in their practices and mass selling ‘better’ vitamins. The editor of one of these journals was a paid consultant of a company that sells complex homeopathic remedies which I exposed as ineffective and harmful. The other examples of these ‘open-minded’ hypocrites in alternative medicine involves rejection of my presentation of FCT by several naturopathic associations at their ‘educational’ events. This was in spite of the testimonials of many naturopathic doctors who stated that FCT was the only way out of their specialty failures. Above all, my proposal was supported by a variety of documented reversals of serious chronic diseases which would have remained incurable, otherwise. Likewise, while classical (250 year-old) homeopathy is facing the brink of extinction due to its failure to produce convincing results in the treatment of chronic diseases, the management of its professional associations display far more concern about control over their members and memberships, doing business with the vendors and collecting donations than the actual quality of care of classical homeopathy. My proposals to the National Center for Homeopathy and the American Institute of Homeopathy to present documented reversals of serious chronic disease through FCT’s novel homeopathic approach, based on contemporary medical knowledge versus a dated 250 year-old one, were rejected by both. My proposals to conventional specialists to conduct clinical trials with FCT on chronic Lyme, brain concussions in athletes, and other pathologies all fell on the same dead ears. This vice of control is common to scientists whose Disney Land type of image is correctly shattered by the aforementioned British biologist, Dr. Rupert Sheldrake: “People who have faith in scientists know next to nothing about science” and that their majority resembles more of a “border police”. The statement of Professor Robert Becker, MD on this invisible subject to public eye and majority of medical practitioners is just as revealing: “I want the general public to know that science isn’t run the way they read about it in the newspapers and magazines. I want lay people to understand that they cannot automatically accept scientists’ pronouncements at face values, for too often they are self-serving and misleading”.

The end result of all of these is the dead-ended futile activities of current conventional and alternative-integrative medical practices and research, which are based on speculations of low scientific value, as reflected in this illustration:

The FCT’s solution to this impasse, that has been amply confirmed in practice, with documented reversals of chronic diseases, is based on science fundamentals which focus on the very causes of diseases and requires far less actual endless medical knowledge.

A viable medical theory that our NIH is still searching for that establishes a healthy bridge between basic research and applied science in medicine is, ultimately, the only way out of this dead-ended circle of failures, waste and deceit.

“Nothing in science — nothing in life, for that matter —
makes sense without theory.”
“Scientists love to speculate and fall in love with
their speculations, so did I.
However, scientific theories are constructed
specifically to be blown apart if proved wrong.”
Harvard biology professor, Edward O. Wilson, PhD
“No attempt to solve a scientific problem can even
be begun without the subsidy of some hypothesis.”
Nobel Laureate in medicine,
Peter Medawar, PhD

How FCT has engineered a healthy science-to-practice bridge for a simple, effective and cost-contained medicine based on a science that NIH has been seeking. A little history and interesting paradoxes.

“Knowledge is knowledge and it doesn’t matter if it is conventional or alternative…”
Alternative Medicine – The risks of untested and unregulated remedies, NEJM,
Sept. 1998, vol. 339, no. 12
“Is the scientific paper fraudulent?”
On the Nature of Scientific Thought,
Nobel prize laureate in medicine,
Professor Peter Medawar, PhD
“The most revolutionary discoveries have arisen
out of observations that did not fit prevailing
scientific doctrine and required
a reexamination of the fundamental concepts.”
Nobel prize laureate in medicine,
Professor Joshua Lederberg, PhD
In the mid-1980s, after conventional specialists stated their inability to cure my very sick son, my spouse and I, as many desperate people often do, took the alternative road. Becoming as enthusiastic about these many new unusual approaches and products as their promoters were, I, besides trying these on my son, was also implementing them in my practice. But neither my son nor my really sick patients showed any progress. Besides, treatments promoted as safe and natural worsened his condition and some patients who took these treatments had the same experience. Later on, it became obvious that truly natural treatments, short of mud baths, do not exist as these all are man-made, and likewise ‘safe’ is only a hope, not an inherent property of any treatment. Further explorations of endless alternative approaches fell into the same pattern of ‘now you see it, now you don’t,’ where enthusiastic presentations at training events and through marketing opuses kept turning into failures in practice. But in the process, I became intrigued by two interesting paradoxes in both conventional and alternative medicines and decided to suspend further exploration of this bottomless medical field until I resolved these. One paradox is that between a medical professor or just a lay ‘healer’ and dozens of alternative approaches in-between, all claim addressing something ‘important’ for disease. This might be testing, treatment, diet; something metabolic, nutritional, immune, hormonal, allergic, structural, energetic, genetic, emotional and, even, astrological. Just looking at so many spirited bestsellers, in health and medicine, authored even by psychic mediums, makes one wonder how come that no one can say anything wrong? The reasons they can’t, on surface, because million things have something to do with disease and health. This alone makes all of these claims automatically look good, at least, on paper. It is not wrong to convey some relevant factors on the subject as long as their limitations are made transparent, too. In the meantime, in the absence of reversal of chronic diseases and the existence of endless factors in these, the field of inexactness can deem ‘important’ anything in the eyes of the beholder.

The following few, out of endless cases of failure, deliver the point of the real importance of the chosen factors and treatments in both medicines.

A sick young woman: “For the first four years, I went to see the best conventional medical specialists in New York City with no results. For the second four years, I have gone through the best alternative, integrative and complimentary centers in Manhattan, with no results. Then, out of desperation I turned to a shaman, because he wrote a book about his successful medical treatment. I took his treatment and felt even worse.” Note that the shaman did not treat through some spiritual rituals, but through medical diagnosis and products because these ‘made sense’ while being medically illiterate in medicine. The fact alone, that failures of supposed to be top medical professionals, doctors, opened doors to lay people: nutritionists, herbalists, homeopaths, energy movers, and others to treat something ‘important’ in disease places today’s medicine at the lowest level, as science. How many lay people would practice physics? Yet, biology and, certainly, medicine as correctly noted by Harvard biology Professor, Edward Wilson, PhD, “is unimaginably more complex than physics”. Same said by Nobel laureate in medicine, George Wald, PhD, “Even such a technological marvel, as the electronic brain, is nothing compared to even as primitive living being as an amoeba”. But the real tragedy of the dismal state of medicine goes beyond quotes and lies in the fact that it is the single most important science of all, for us, because our quality of life and its very span depend on our health. Today, in the US alone we have over 100 million people suffering from just a single disease — chronic pain. Do you want to ask them about the American dream of “pursuit of happiness”? Certainly, it is not shamans or alternative activists to be blamed for our healthcare catastrophe because they just fill in the market vacuum created by the ineptitude of the medical and osteopathic doctors due to their poor training, forcing the desperate into anyone’s hands. Statements of other patients leave little doubt about this point whose practitioners were treating something ‘important’ in disease.

“I saw 90 million doctors, mainly alternative, integrative, you name it, I am still as sick”.

—–Original Message—–
From: Elaine…@comcast.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 1
2:05 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FCT Field Control Therapy Contact: Mold exposure & Lyme

Message:
I was wondering if you could help me. I’ve been sick (for) 30 yrs. have gone everywhere spending thousands of dollars. I heard you were very good.

—–Original Message—–
Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 12:13 PM
To:[email protected]

Hello,
We need help! We have been trying to help our son who is 10 for 10 years to heal with his many challenges, including congenital Lyme. We have been to dozens upon dozens of practitioners and he is still unimproved.
Can you refer a practitioner trained in your technique near our home please. We live in Pasadena California.
Thank you kindly

What do alternative-integrative practitioners say about the real prowess of these treatments when it comes to their own health? Quoting only one of them, a recent patient: “I’ve been having some health issues that no one has really gotten to the bottom of.” “Some health issues” involved head to toe systemic debilitating problems, some for up to 20 years, with zero progress after many alternative-integrative treatments.

Photo, courtesy of Elijah Yurkovsky
Above is a recent photo of a suitcase—plus of ‘important natural products’ consumed by a woman to treat her ‘important’ health problems. These are not ‘natural treatments’ but a crude and mindless pharmaceutical rape of the body. She spent 34 years in vain, since the age of 16, searching for cures in alternative-integrative medicine after conventional medicine failed. Beside this suitcase there was also a warehouse of more treatments: intravenous nutrients and chelators, ozone, electrocutions, homeopathics and other energy medicines and drugs.

There are hundreds of websites which sell most of these ‘important’ substances which carry far more potential for harm and none for cure.

Just one look at the website, that has impressively labeled itself as “the #1 most visited natural health site” (Mercola.com) exposes the real goal of this ‘holistic doctor-educator’ turned pill peddler—his shopping cart. This is full of products which benefits, side effects and harm for individual people with individual health needs he cannot possibly know. While, as many ‘holistic educators’ of this type, he blasts conventional medicine, pharmaceutical drugs and ‘educates’ about harm of mercury and other toxic metals, yet the ‘natural’ pharmaceuticals sold off this “#1 natural site”, contain mercury and toxic metals!

This article covers one of these, Himalayan salt, which he peddles too. I also found toxic metals listed in his ‘special’ vitamins. Just to give you another mean tip, I’ve never encountered a charlatan whose vitamins, probiotics or anything else would be less than ‘special’ or ‘highest quality’. Likely, the next ‘educational’ upgrade on a ‘natural’ site like this, will be a line of ‘holistic’ washers and dryers and natural condoms. To mention again, that since natural treatments do not even exist, anyone who promotes ‘natural’ website, pills or treatments is a red flag for a charlatan. If this breed of peddlers studied relevant sciences, such as toxicology and geology, instead of marketing tricks of fooling internet search engines how to draw bigger crowds to their shopping carts and then fool the crowds, too they would have known that real natural products can be more poisonous than unnatural. Earth, besides contaminated oceans, contains many natural poisons such as mercury, arsenic, lead, cobalt and others, whereas with unnatural products the manufacturers have far greater control in excluding toxic ingredients.

Returning to ‘important treatments,’ certain homeopathic companies taking advantage of an ‘equal opportunity’ exploitation in this field, sell no less than homeopathic structured DNA water based on some mickey-mouse study and the magic word, DNA. Many desperate and destitute parents of autistic children get embezzled $500 for some senseless set of this ‘DNA’ water packed with similar toys. The end result of this, reported to me by the few parents, as expected, none.

How does one determine what is really important to treat in disease among million of important things? By finding the right means to address those factors which deem as the most important and responsible for both diseases, themselves, and failure to reverse these. Conventional medicine has correctly referred to these as main causes of chronic diseases, which remain unknown, and inability to administer personalized treatments. As correctly emphasized by the former editor of the Journal of American Medical Association, associate professor of medicine, Lester S. King, MD, in his book Medical Thinking, the knowledge of cause, is the one that sets higher caliber scientists and doctors from those who just register consequences or shadows of causes. The causes in diseases are never singular but several and acting in a mutually sustained mode. As an example, the most popular these days entities in medicine, inflammation, gluten sensitivity, chronic infections, poor DNA methylation and malfunctioning MTHFR enzyme in spite of offering floods of impressive scientific references represent a far lower grade of science than a source pointing to their exact causes. That is why those who just specialize in inflammation, gluten sensitivity, chronic infections, malfunctioning methylation and MTHFR enzyme and other ‘important’ things never cure these. This may sound paradoxical but the way specializations in medicine are taught, narrows even more the already overly narrow approach to diseases to assure failures far more than non-specialists who embark on a far more general but prudent system approach.
James Grier Miller, MD PhD (1916‐2002)

A quote on the subject, of one of those men in medicine who was ahead of his time, the author of a lucid work, Living Systems, former Harvard University and John Hopkins University scholar, James Grier Miller MD, PhD: “The specialist languages, however, limit the horizons of thought to the borders of the discipline. They mask important intertype and interlevel generalities which exist and make general theory as difficult as it is to think about snow in a language that has no word for it.” In other words, all diseases are multisystemic, that also includes their primary causes, while specialists in both medicines focus on something localized or think of it in the foreign to disease language that ends up in apples treating oranges. This is the same as treating oranges through the language and products of apples, which are void of knowledge that is necessary for solution. The most effective way to practice system medicine is through properly addressing the causes of disease which cause both localized and systemic effects with the both being important. That is why FCT specializes in causes where a disease name is irrelevant, per se. I named this approach, in one of my articles, a non-disease treatment of diseases.

“Science consists in knowing things by their causes”
Daniel Sennert MD
(1572 – 1637)

“To know scientifically is to understand things by their causes. A man of science knows the why of things. All because the very root of word science is to know.” Lester S. King MD
This is the main reason why physicists, whose approach to problems is at the top of science pyramid in quality, always strive to approach problems at their deepest or fundamental level. They say, as physics Professor David Deutch, “depth makes it easy, breadth makes it hard.” In medicine, with its millions of findings on surface, hard actually means impossible. That is why he said, medicine needs so many specialists, because there is no end to surface with the end result of its treatments remaining the same — failure and escalating costs. Obviously, neither in conventional nor in alternative-integrative one, operating at only superficial level of breadth is not a virtue but a sign of weakness and low caliber service. Even when seemingly aiming that ‘deep’, as at a gene level, and treating hypomethylation and involved MTHFR enzyme, the truth is that this approach is as superficial as applying a bandaid to a nail. Seeking business lab and vitamin companies fool gullible alternative-integrative practitioners and patients that these are some fatalistic genetic misfortunes behind diseases which yearn ‘life saving’ pills, as B vitamins and others. Yet, in reality these are just as another superficial of symptoms as a sniffle or skin rash, with B vitamins amounting to a bandaid which is neither natural nor benign. The scientists, who understand this field far better than these practitioners, myself, labs and vitamin companies, share far less publicized but true information which also explains why my Bio-resonance testing has been finding, over the years, all these B and other vitamins as ‘healthy’ as chemotherapy. Besides the optimal therapeutic range for this supplementation being so narrow that is impossible to determine through lab tests, where undermethylation quickly turns overmethylation which leads to cancer, different tissues in the body have different methylation rate that is impossible to match pharmaceutically, neither therapeutically nor safely. Furthermore, geneticists also confirm FCT approach by pointing that both methylation and gene malfunctions are, usually, caused too by correctable causes. Among these: bad diet, poor absorption of nutrients, including B vitamins, due to intestinal infections and chemicals, damaged by antibiotics and mercury gut flora; environmental pollutants and other morbid factors. Through a sound approach, such as FCT, all of these can be corrected on an individual, not a retail basis. A large human study has registered more cancer versus a control group, when this ‘genetic’ problem was attempted to be corrected through pharmaceutical rape by B vitamins. In contrast, FCT has a documented case of recovered autistic boy whose mother refused a slew of vitamin pills recommended by DAN doctors for his malfunctioning MTHFR enzyme. I gave him none of these.

Certainly, before evolving FCT I, as all health practitioners still do, kept struggling in the past trying to figure out the difference between what both medicines deemed as ‘important’ endless targets in diseases and what science views important in solving problems. Fortunately, the answer came from my investigation of the other and even bigger paradox which still fools many, in both medicines, failures in the name of science. This concerns references to science and research to justify favorite paradigms and their treatments. But, why would science, which we normally associate with impressive technological successes, from telecommunications to space exploration, have to be a partner of failure in medicine? Little did I know that an exploration for answers to these paradoxes, plus a little luck, would lead to a discovery of a way for medicine to be finally placed on a solid scientific foundation and leave its basement level of science that dooms it to fail. The solution began to unravel through learning key fundamental steps, used by exact sciences and their based technologies to solve difficult problems.

These are: determination of the main causes of a problem and capable means to address it. These require a theory which offer these leads and explains failures. While conventional medicine does understand an importance of learning from failures by seeking their reasons, its limited paradigm or software does not have enough options to offer these. Alternative-integrative medicine neither acknowledges failures nor can explain these. The absence of proper explanations of failures makes their correction impossible.

The only general science that could offer a sound theory as to why so many seemingly important leads, tests and treatments, as in medicine, end up in failure is the science of complexity. It also opens doors to other important sciences which offer capable diagnostic tests and treatments. Its study has been intensified, lately, due to a realization that all major problems from economy to weather patterns, and social issues to biology are complex and may require a variety of sciences which deal with different aspects of complexities. Many multidisciplinary scientists including biologists and Nobel laureates assembled at the famous think tank, Santa Fe Institute to study complexity. So far, it has produced no breakthroughs in biology or medicine but this work is very important.
Alexander Bogdanov (1873 – 1928) Philosopher, physician, scientist and economist. The first to introduce systems theory and its principles for all living and nonliving structures. Ludwig von Bertalanffy, PhD. 09/19/1901 – 06/12/1972. Biologist and philosopher. Author of General System Theory (1969) and its applications in biology and other sciences.

The Harvard Working Group: “…diseases cannot be reduced to a single cause nor explained within the prevailing linear scientific method: complexity is their hallmark.”

In the meantime the sobering reality, as stated by biology Professor Edward O. Wilson PhD, remains that: “The great majority of scientists, their moods focused narrowly on well-defined phenomena, do not care about complexity theory. Many have not yet heard of it”. Among the “many” is, virtually, the entire medical profession, except for a few self-taught.

The image below reflects the both reasons for so many things to treat in medicine, based on complexity, as well as just as many traps leading to failures in interconnected and interdependent complex systems such as the human body.

The treachery of complexity in chronic diseases and recovery

Here, thousands of cogs which represent something abnormal in disease organ, biochemical, anatomical, morphological, energetic entities, causes of these abnormalities render the aforementioned trillions of possible combinations of these to formally justify any test and treatment. The enormity of these options and traps for failure is the reason why scientists who understand complexity have referred to the work of a physician as “messy” and “impossible.”

How do you think conventional and alternative medicines choose which, out of the endless number of cogs and wheels, to treat or ignore? This question has been answered by the aforementioned book, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, which states that both medicines continue practicing and promoting only those cogs and wheels from the entire complex system which benefit them far more than their patients. The choice of cogs constitutes the very essence of the scientific process because any science is flooded with choices. That is why there has been an unspoken bitter pill in science, stated by renowned philosopher of science, Professor Karl Popper, PhD, that all scientific theories always carry an element of falsehood or incompleteness because they automatically exclude better choices. This could be out of ignorance, on purpose because better choices threaten the favorite paradigm, or better choices exist in nature but remain yet undiscovered by science. For the same reason, Nobel laureate in Medicine, Professor Medawar stated that any scientific paper represents an element of fraud because its convincing ‘good’ reasons are no guarantee that better ones might have been left out (“Is the scientific paper fraudulent?” On the Nature of Scientific Thought, Peter Medawar, August 1964). This is especially true within complex systems and problems as in medicine, where facts and reasons are abundant where a wrongly chosen cog to treat or its wrong treatment cause failure, and often, harm through an inevitable domino effect due to cogs and wheels being interconnected. In addition, if even most logical treatment ignores fluctuations in function of cogs due to common adverse environmental, dietary, lifestyle, and other factors including other treatments and self-treatments, a high risk of failure and harm follow. Science of complexity, under its Law of Unintended Consequences, has registered consistent poor outcomes of seemingly logical, when these aimed only at isolated ‘make sense’ targets or cogs within interconnected and interdependent systems. That is why it is only logical under the law that ‘natural’ alternative-integrative treatments are seemingly, paradoxically exceeding conventional in producing side effects, based on countless patient testimonials. The reasons are that when so many treatments and products are thrown inside interconnected system blindly, just based on some book knowledge or marketed ‘holistic’ literature which are usually detached from actual patients, the bodies of progressively weaker and sicker people (just look at the skyrocketing rates of autism, ADHD, diabetes, and allergies among children and plummeting fertility rates among young adults), cannot handle these. Among the countless examples presented in FCT webinars, seminars and their recordings is a woman who became an invalid for 18 years, until treated by FCT, after following a simple 3-day ‘colon detox program’ which, like a majority of blind ‘natural detoxes’, set the unanticipated cog wheels in motion. A young man, whose detailed ordeal is presented in webinar #60, said: “As sick as I felt before, but after that treatment, I felt that I was dying.” While these treatments are very costly and administered at the ‘best’ alternative-integrative clinics in the U.S. and Europe, after following another ‘natural’ treatment, in the ‘best’ clinic in Europe, he ended up in an intensive care unit. He remains a severe invalid and his mother who, understandably, after spending a six-digit figure out-of-pocket over the years, wanted “no more of these treatments”. Among these are Lyme ‘literate’ and similar ‘specialists’ in autism and other diseases whose treatments makes one shiver from their inflicted harm. See, also, this testimonial concerning the ‘best’ alternative-integrative clinics in the U.S. and Europe using fads with impressive names, such as the popular ‘Marshall protocol for the immune system’, in alternative medicine: https://www.yurkovsky.com/patients-corner/patient-testimonials/, Case 3 (Parts 1-5). Even a golden bullet of integrative ‘holistic’ doctors, intravenous vitamin C, has turned a young woman into an invalid for a whole year. Seven years after this ‘natural’ treatment, by the time I saw her, she has still not recovered. All of these facts are the reasons why science values most those theories which do not carry conflicts with other important knowledge, rather than just presenting all the ‘good’ reasons. Has anyone ever seen mistakes or, even, crimes being committed without a ‘reason’? (The multiple criteria for sound scientific theory, or what your teachers don’t want you to know, can be found in FCT webinar recordings 20 through 33). These, some dozen criteria take all of the hyped PR work, out of ‘scientifically based treatments’ as all of these collapse in both medicines beyond, even, two criteria. Everyone is invited to apply the same scrutiny to FCT. As it has been amply presented in FCT program, unlike a general enthusiasm on the subject of generic stimulation of the immune system this act represents a great risk to one’s health, as any generic or blind retail treatment that is administered without a regard for a person’s individual immune system. Instead, it must be carried out cautiously and under the proper guidance of Bio-resonance testing and its theory, as taught through FCT curriculum. The skeptics of this statement, besides numerous presented examples through FCT program, may refer to oncologists stating that the latest biggest hope in oncology, immunotherapy, has both failed and caused side effects.

The alternative industry and its media continue highlighting ‘good’ reasons for treating their favorite cogs and exploiting in the process both alternative-integrative practitioners and patients.

On the positive side, complexity offers a great opportunity for reversals of chronic diseases, with the simplest and inexpensive means, your proverbial “dollar return on a penny”. It is because that it allows to select from any science, as well as conventional and alternative medical specialties, the most relevant knowledge and related necessary diagnostic and therapeutic means to reverse and prevent chronic diseases through a positive domino effect, throughout the entire system, by acting just at a few key cog wheels. This equally applies to the treatment of recurrent acute diseases, most of which herald chronic diseases but are treated with short sighted symptom erasing or blocking methods, which ignore the deeper underlying causes and speed up the onset of chronic diseases. Science has always valued theories and their actions which can do more with less, by addressing a few fundamental cog wheels, over the laborious kitchen sinks. It is known as Occam’s Razor, where a few key concepts and their based actions automatically cover thousands of their dependent details.

How can complexity fulfill the general receipe of science for finding solutions?

Facing endless possible combinations “due to the enormous complexity and interplay of all possible pathological components present in chronic diseases” (Complexity and Medicine, by Professor Colin Alexander MD), science recommends, quoting Nobelist Lederberg, to look for unusual observations in relation to prevailing approaches. Following this one is to find the right means to make mistakes fast to sort out relevant options in order to get closer to a solution. The most unusual and outright stunning observations, in all medicine, are rendered by classical or original way to practice homeopathy. There one drop of water, or a pellet of a properly prescribed remedy, can take a person back in time playing back all of his deeply buried unresolved medical problems, even, since infancy. These problems as in the actual play back mode CD come and go following which a person’s health, often, dramatically improves. But, more importantly, the lessons derived from these stunning observations, known as Hering’s Law, teach us the several important concepts.

Homeopathy is the single deepest medical modality, that can be likened to a medical rocket

Given energetic, not pharmaceutical, nature of homeopathic remedies humans are fundamentally energetic beings who readily respond to well prescribed energetic signals when these carry high meaning in relation to their health. Note, high meaning is the one that sets highly effective energetic medical interventions from their many bandaids in energy medicine such as so called ‘Rife’, bio-photon voltage, and many other machines which purport to kill, detoxify, balance, or recharge body energy and perform other interesting activities. The key difference is that high meaning treatments meet patient’s primary body needs in defeating disease, while just energy or any other treatment mainly meet practitioners needs to dispense treatment, to make him feel useful.

These deeply buried in tissues unresolved and forgotten medical problems must cause suboptimal functioning of the organs involved and health, overall, which many people take for ‘norm’, not ever knowing their true health potential. Same unresolved problems or causes also render low resistance to current and future diseases.

Such therapeutic responses render the majority of other treatments unnecessary.

Concerning classical homeopathy, however, we also must note another important observation that it has been increasingly incapable of successfully treating chronic diseases in modern populations. That is why, in addition to its confounding energetic nature to pharmaceutically programmed minds, its failure to produce impressive studies in the treatment of chronic diseases has led to calls in the US, Great Britain and Russia to do away with this ‘placebo-water’. Yet, instead of following through on this stupidity-classic of throwing the baby out with the bath water we need to find a good explanation for failure first, as to why such a powerful treatment works poorly in modern populations. Obviously, space programs in the US and Soviet Union, reached their goals, following initial failures, not by producing better steam engines but by improving space rockets. Our explanation is that as rockets in the military cannot guarantee a success unless these can reach targets of high strategic importance, neither can homeopathy in spite of its deep penetrating power. For this the several conditions are to be met: a military doctrine, or medical theory which assigns a level of importance to targets, high quality intelligence gathering concerning their exact location and a capable navigation system to reach these. If we are to liken disease to an enemy, which it is, it follows that since homeopathic rockets have failed to destroy it they had to miss some important targets. How do we determine a relative degree of strategic importance of targets in disease, when these are so many? Here, instead of referring to scientific medical literature, that often serves the goal of marketing ‘important’ treatments for any target in patients’ bodies, we do just the opposite. We go to patients bodies, first, to draw observations which treatments have produced the most beneficial results after treating certain targets. When the results are very impressive and no longer artificially sustained by continuing symptom suppressive treatments through drugs, ‘natural’, machines, then we look for the corresponding scientific literature concerning the role of these targets in disease. In my observations, there was a number of patients who undertook chelation therapy for cardiovascular disease to remove heavy metals such as mercury, lead and others who, besides reporting a significant improvement in their angina, also reported a good progress in other important aspects of health. These were better energy level, overall better circulation by feeling warmer and having less pain in the legs on walking, due to improved symptoms of peripheral vascular disease, and less stiffness and better joints motion. Also, some patients even with severe neurological disorders reported good progress following intravenous mercury chelators. The scientific literature contains thousands of references concerning hundreds of diseases and symptoms associated with toxicity of mercury and other toxic metals. It also states that these metals are present in the bodies of virtually 100% of modern populations, from infancy on, and among the pathologies these cause is also suppression of the immune system, leading to infections and cancer.

Infections, too affect humans from brain to toe, can trigger and sustain any chronic disease and have been on steep rise. Examples of Lyme disease and co-infections, PANDAS, MRSA, mad cow disease or herpes are indicative of significant pathologies caused by chronic infections. The same with the great benefits of preventative role of vaccines (short of the occasions of their side effects) of serious infections. Thus, infections is another target of high strategic importance in chronic diseases.

However, on the negative side chelators, intravenous, oral and other render, also, far less positive and even negative observations, where patients either did not improve, or suffered harm. Likewise, any antimicrobial treatment may fail and, particularly, with antibiotics cause harm. The kitchen sink attempts, even when using homeopathy, of alternative-integrative medicine to overcome these flip-flop outcomes have not made the difference. The only way out is through an intelligence gathering of high quality concerning exact location of these targets in the body, how much of these still remain, following any treatment, and how to avoid a friendly fire, too. Textbooks of toxicology deem laboratory tests unfit for reliable intelligence information because the internal organs, which harbor environmental pollutants, are inaccessible to lab tests, and accessible body fluids offer poor correlation with the actual toxins in the internal organs. The same shortcomings of laboratory tests apply in a high degree to infections, as evidenced in the majority of missed Lyme, its co-infections, or parasites. Comes to rescue physics and its notion that energy fields represent a fundamental ontological level of organs and tissues, as of any matter: toxicological, infectious and other morbid agents. The diagnostic methods based on this level, Bio-resonance testing, can non-invasively directly correct with any internal organ in seconds, from brain to toe, in a virtual email mode communication. If conducted properly, it can easily establish presence of any morbid agents inside organs, which produce their illness, or malfunction before a full blown disease emerges. Thanks to this testing the inability of many detoxifying methods to properly accomplish this has become obvious, as well as their unavoidable high risk of harm by redistributing toxicological agents uncontrollably to other organs, through blood that contains high amount of these following their mobilization by chelators and other detoxifying substances. Toxicological literature warns of this, too. Likewise, the inability of antimicrobial agents to eradicate most of the chronic infections has been established beyond doubt, based on the recoveries following their FCT treatments. Once the effective intelligence gathering has been established it ends the blizzard with its hit and miss actions and detects and corrects mistakes fast. Here, Bio-resonance testing intelligence gathering, as well as patients responses to the remedies based on it, has enabled FCT to determine the high priorities or most important strategic targets in the treatment and accomplish loading and guidance of homeopathic rockets with high precision and safety.

I presented the scientific premise of Bio-resonance testing and homeopathy, based on physics, in this book, The Power of Digital Medicine, that was endorsed by the prominent physicists, Professor William A. Tiller PhD, of Stanford University, and Professor George Edgin Pugh PhD, of MIT. It also referenced a successful homeopathic research concerning detoxification of environmental pollutants and treatment and prevention of infectious diseases. All research, relevant modern medical knowledge in relation to chronic diseases and successful and safe clinical experience have led to FCT loading homeopathic rockets with different, more important and precise warheads, in comparison to 250 year-old classical homeopathic method. The exact target sites of the rocket—specific organs—which require detoxification, disinfection, revitalization of their functions or all three, as well as the power of the rocket—its effective homeopathic potency—are all addressed. Overall FCT strategy also factors in patients’ environment and lifestyle and guides accordingly to make these synergistic, instead of antagonistic to the treatment.

Here, a single measuring tool — Bio-resonance testing – is capable of noninvasively establishing the true causes of disease, making obsolete the great majority of superfluous tests and saving patients from enormous medical expenses. In one FCT webinars recording one can view an endless pile of copies of lab and imaging tests—conventional, alternative, integrative—over a decade time span. While all of these were filled with impressive looking data reporting something abnormal and followed by all sorts of treatments the patient remained just as sick. Likewise, an administration of energetically programmed water, which is the essence of homeopathy, with the information of high meaning concerning the main bullets—causes—of disease can reverse the great majority of diseases.

“Programmed water may become the next wonder drug”
The world authority on the science of water,
Professor of Bioengineering at University of Washington,
Gerald Pollack, PhD
Since the healing consequences of a positive domino effect on thousands of organs, tissues and functions, combined, is impossible to predict, all one needs to do is to skillfully extract the bullets that are the causes of the disease which unblocks the body’s ability to conduct its own self-repair. That is why I have often encountered patients reporting an improvement or disappearance of health problems which they did not initially report and for which I, sometimes, did not give any specific remedies. As a recent example, an integrative MD with Marfan’s Syndrome reported that after a single FCT treatment, an ultrasound of his chest aorta (which tends to dilate in this disease due to its weak walls and burst) showed shrinkage compared to a prior study. Yet, his FCT regimen did not contain any remedy or nutritional supplements for this disease, considered purely genetic where dilated aorta is not deemed correctable, other than by surgery. Such cases in this disease are unheard of and his regular conventional doctor was so impressed that he told him to “continue that treatment.”

As the case with this man and many other patients, whose conditions I have never treated before, another, and recent case of a young woman with gynecological problem which even her gynecologist said “I’ve never seen anything like this before,” and did not know how to treat it was cured through just two different energetic drops. I have cured several children from some mysterious syndromes, diseases, which I never heard of before. Yet, specialists who studied these for decades couldn’t. All of these are just a few practical benefits of: “depth makes it easy” over “breadth makes it hard”. Concerning main causes of diseases, in conventional medicine, these remain unknown, in alternative medicine their number and their respective tests and treatments exceeds stars in the sky. To mention a few: nutritional deficiencies, excessive fluoridation, gluten and other food allergies imbalanced energy, bad MTHFR gene, mercury, molds, biotoxins, negative emotions or just a bad immune system. However, with the exact measuring tools as skillful Bio-resonance testing, one can easily tell the difference between the notorious red herring and real causes among these. I consider myself lucky that following years of my frustrations with alternative medicine, in the past, I accidentally came across an obscure article entitled, Future Medicine Will Be Based on Controlled Energy Fields by Professor Emeritus and former chairman of the Materials Science department at Stanford University, William A. Tiller, PhD.

Professor William A. Tiller, PhD
As an expert in physics, the science that ultimately explains the fundamental nature of all matter, including living cells, and establishes its optimal measuring tools and acting forces he states that due to fundamental energetic nature of our cells energetic diagnostics such as Bio-resonance testing and energetic treatments such as homeopathy and acupuncture, are to play a primary role in medicine. However, not having a medical background, he could not be more specific or comment on the exact causes of diseases. In the end, tests and treatments, even with their utmost potential, are just tools, but it is their GPS or theory that guides them to maximizing their potential.

In addition to many other sources in physics and bio-physics, an article entitled, Is a Living System a Macroscopic Quantum System by, perhaps, the most prolific researcher in the world in bio-resonance testing and homeopathy, British physicist Cyril W. Smith, PhD, convinced me that the ignored energetic aspect of the human body holds tremendous unrealized potential in reversing chronic diseases, by determining and properly addressing their causes.

Physicist, Cyril W. Smith PhD
Finding the right diagnostic and therapeutic means

The chosen Bio-resonance test to screen internal organs for causes of their disease is a non-force version of Applied Kinesiology. In order to avoid any confusion in determining causes, only strictly specific homeopathic remedies exactly matching the potential causes detected by Bio-resonance test were used, avoiding any other treatments. The clinical response to these remedies was also correlated with diagnostic measurements of residual content of causes and served as a measuring scale to determine both their respective clinical importance in causing diseases, as well as the real power of a treatment to address these. The test also could suggest ahead of time a true benefit, or potential harm of any treatment or product, drug, nutritional supplement, herb, homeopathic etc. The scientific weight of both the testing and treatment were valued highest when the reversals of serious chronic diseases could be documented through conventional diagnostic tests. Other treatments, conventional or alternative, to just suppress symptoms were avoided. Centuries-long experience in homeopathy and personal observations proved such suppressive ‘successes’ as short-lived and, often, leading to worse diseases later on. This is just as logical as leaving a bullet inside the body and only treating multiple medical problems which it creates: immune, endocrine, gastrointestinal, neurological, cardiovascular and others. In the end, the unextracted bullet will continue wearing out and destroying the body to the point where worse diseases and premature death become unavoidable. The very essence of Hering’s law followed by recoveries, was in the body finally releasing morbid substances cemented in there, by symptoms suppressive treatments. If any treatment does not produce a Hering law it is not a true treatment, but only a suppressive bandaid. FCT produces Hering law consistently. Bio-resonance testing has also exposed serious limitations and harm of many alternative treatments: chelators, detoxifiers, binders, for Lyme, candidiasis, parasitosis, molds, as well as energetic modalities, including other types of homeopathy. Countless patient cases have confirmed this over the years, as well as the equivalent of the second law of thermodynamics in medicine, that reversals of the great majority of chronic diseases cannot be achieved with pharmaceutical treatments, either conventional or alternative. These agents lack the necessary specificity, depth and control over their actions and, therefore, are incapable of properly addressing the deep-seated, widespread and interacting causes of disease in the body. Doing this ‘naturally’ makes as much of a difference as constructing the unconstructable, self-sustained machines, using natural materials.

Speaking of the second law, it’s about time medicine is to establish one in order to stop fooling practitioners and patients with ‘new and better’ treatments and wasting enormous resources on meaningless research, tests and therapies. In creating it, FCT followed a cardinal rule in science “make your mistakes fast” (because the wrong options are so many) by drastically reducing this process through categorizing thousands of tests, treatments and products combined into general concepts. This takes away the aura of something impressive just because it is ‘new’ or ‘just discovered’, especially in alternative-integrative medicine, where these are born by the minute. But if one knows the weaknesses and strengths of a given category where a test, or a treatment belongs to then, as in a technology sector, one can easily distinguish an airborne motorcycle from a true flying vehicle as an airplane, and a cruise missile from a hot air balloon.

“A fundamental procedure in science is
to make generalizations from one system to another
on the basis of some similarity between the systems…
which permits to class them together.”

The concepts is what sets FCT apart from other ‘similar to FCT methods’, which invariably fool alternative-integrative practitioners, that is further examined in the next section. In the end an equivalent of the second law in medicine amounts to, if a medical approach is unable to diagnose and properly treat main causes of disease it, inevitably, is incapable of reversing chronic diseases and amounts to a bandaids. It is especially common for alternative-integrative practitioners to spend years on taking courses in programs and obtaining flashy certificates in treatments, most of which amount to bandaids. FCT program fully addresses this common mistake. The information following, the Distinctive Features of FCT Medical System, helps to distinguish some of these bandaids which appear to be similar to FCT.
The Distinctive features of the FCT medical system, which set it apart from other ‘similar’ Bio-resonance testing and homeopathy

“While it is quite reasonable for scientists to be skeptical of
new ideas that do not fit within the accepted
realm of scientific knowledge, the best science
often emerges from situations where results carefully
obtained do not fit within the accepted paradigms.”
Nobel Laureate in Medicine, Stanley Prusiner, MD
“Thank you for another excellent training. If I were to use only one treatment, this would be FCT.”
Mark Orbay, ND

“For me, by far the most helpful training has been your material. One of the huge differences between your approaches is your pursuit of excellence and application of scientific principles. You seem to be on the leading edge – at least compared to any of the rest of us.”
An alternative medical practitioner

“The complexity of FCT is what makes it powerful.” An alternative medical practitioner

There is a common misunderstanding among the alternative-integrative practitioners that there is some standard way to practice these methods, or some are good while others even better. In reality, short of classical homeopathy and traditional Chinese medicine, there are no standard ways to practice anything in alternative medicine, that certainty includes Bio-resonance testing and homeopathy where the both can be utilized in thousands of different ways. And as in the rest of alternative industry the claims of ‘better’ begin and end in marketing literature with zero proof in real practice. Bio-resonance testing, aside from many different techniques, amounts to a microphone through which one may ask a patient million questions and thousands of homeopathic remedies can be used in, even, billions of ways. The following is what sets FCT’s Bio-resonance testing and homeopathic method apart from the rest.

1. Foremost, their use is free from any conflict with other sciences and medical specialties.

2. Its general guiding theory is based on the important relevant concepts of science of complexity that allows extraction of the most useful knowledge from any scientific discipline, conventional and alternative medical specialties, in order to attain optimal results.

As emphasized in the section, WHY FCT, the entire success of any science depends on a single most important factor, a chosen theory. Indeed its guiding role is as important as one of GPS, road map or a driver’s knowledge how to arrive to point B from point A. Without this guidance a car becomes a useless piece of transportation. As the case with cars, which on the surface all look like good vehicles to get around until we learn that their GPS devices may function from 1% to 100% accuracy range, so do different Bioresonance testing methods and technologies. And the lower is the accuracy of a Bioresonance testing guiding theory, in relation to the nature of chronic disease and the necessary treatment and other measures to reverse it, the more this test becomes a logistic piece of metal.

3. Unlike other ‘similar’ interventions its diagnostic and therapeutic means are uniquely capable of effectively addressing the enormous complexity of disease, with the highest level of safety.

The reasons for this are that diagnostic and therapeutic tools, per se, are of little benefit unless their guiding theory matches the main components of a problem to be solved, ‘similar’ methods don’t. The main components consist of the primary causes of disease, malfunctioned internal organs as well as the detrimental factors in patients lifestyle and environment which sustain disease.

A few examples of FCT addressing both important targets of disease and body as a total system versus ‘similar’ methods which fail at this and just treat some isolated problems of unknown priority.

Case #1
A young woman with chronic fatigue was correctly diagnosed through Bio-resonance testing and treated homeopathically for Epstein Barr Virus. She ended up feeling much worse with her fatigue intensified and developing other debilitating symptoms. When evaluated and treated by FCT, besides this virus, as the case with all infections, other connected malfunctioned cogs and wheels were addressed also. Among, these, her vulnerability to the infection. She made a dramatic progress after a single treatment.

Case #2
A middle-aged woman, in spite of being treated, elsewhere, for a malfunctioned cog – hypothyroidism – with thyroid hormone and having normal thyroid blood tests her symptoms of seemingly low thyroid: fatigue, depression, feeling cold, missing periods, dry skin, hair loss and absent sex drive persisted. However, Bio-resonance testing detected that most of the rest of her endocrine system was malfunctioning too, due to infections, poisoning with heavy metals and environmental electromagnetic fields. All of these causes were properly addressed with a focus on synchronizing all of the involved cog wheels – thyroid and other organs – and she made a complete recovery.

Even though the following case did not involve Bio-resonance testing or homeopathic remedies, yet the great majority of practitioners who use these also prescribe numerous pills, including hormones.

In contrast, an outright tragedy took place for woman of a similar age with low thyroid function who was treated by some ‘progressive’ integrative thyroid specialist. As always the case, the treatment involved an isolated single cog approached in a simplistic pharmaceutical fashion. Following an administration of thyroid hormone, she suddenly developed extreme insomnia with weeks of sleepless nights in a row. This led to a severe depression, fatigue, a nervous breakdown and suicidal attempt for which she was admitted to a psychiatric ward and heavily sedated with multiple drugs. As usual, in all cases when neither the exact cause of malfunctioned organ nor the exact reasons for the side effects of a treatment could be determined, the prescribing doctor did not know how to undo the damage. Neither did another ‘progressive integrative’ DAN doctor, when following his treatment of an autistic child for a cog of mercury, using chelation in the same isolated blinded fashion, the boy developed a new neurological disease. FCT resolved it, virtually, in a single treatment.

4. Clear understanding of advantages and limiting features of diagnostic and therapeutic means.

There is no single field in science or a piece of technology that is free of limitations. What sets true scientists apart from enthusiasts is an awareness of limitations of their approaches. Besides many alternative practitioners taking in face value different varieties of Bio-resonance testing and homeopathy, there is also a common trend to be impressed with esoteric approaches having something to do with photons, bio-photons, something quantum, scalar, pulsing, voltage, or computer based. Yet, none of these play a token of a role in success by and of themselves, but only a capacity of a given diagnostic finding and therapeutic intervention to address the main causes of disease. If all there was to solving complex scientific problems using something quantum, photon, or computer, why haven’t physicists, who are far better at these than alternative practitioners, not been able to replace toxic expensive fossil fuels with water, or cure cancer through some photon, quantum machine? So far, whenever I questioned some of these ‘quantum’ enthusiasts, or computer based impressive interventions about proofs of their alleged superiority, the only answers I have ever received were that I was close-minded and none.

Advantages and limitations of Bio-resonance testing
Bio-resonance testing is based on the science of bio-physics or application of physics to the living and carries both great advantages and many potential limitations. These limitations can be substantially reduced, with proper awareness.

Advantages

Unique capacity to noninvasively energetically communicate with any internal organ and tissue to determine the true causes of disease. No other diagnostic test is capable of accomplishing this, so far.

It can determine the correct sequence in the treatment of detected causes, if guided by sound medical theory.

It can determine a necessity, or side effects, ahead of time, of any other considered treatment: drug, herbal, nutritional supplement, binder, detoxifier, chelator, homeopathic, ozone, stem cell, electromagnetic, chosen acupuncture point, or electromagnetic protective devices.

Limitations

Application of force, either through muscle testing in applied kinesiology, or a metal probe in EAV computerized (acupuncture according to Voll) and VEGA testings, which may distort actual readings.

Muscle fatigue, lack of cooperation of a patient being tested when force is applied in applied kinesiology.

Fluctuations in skin conductance, in EAV, or VEGA testing, due to changes in skin moisture may affect the readings.

FCT utilizes completely force-free type of applied kinesiology testing, based on involuntary muscle reflex response.

Excessive electromagnetic fields in testing room and/or through computerized testing usually distort readings.

FCT does not use electronic equipment and conducts testing in an EMF reduced environment, through effective Memon technology.

Determining treatments based on a superficial level of a problem. This is a common flaw of all of these tests that often leads to significant aggravations because treatment at this level is often followed by intensifying the body’s reaction to the undetected deeper layers of causes of disease.

Based on cellular biophysics, FCT tests at multiple energetic levels through specially developed diagnostic-energetic filters, to determine all relevant underlying causes at a current stage of disease, or compromised health. This also leads to a more complete and safer treatment with expedited recovery time.

It can determine many abnormal findings which are not relevant to disease origin and its sustenance. Among these might be vitamin, mineral and other nutritional deficiencies, foods and other allergies, energetic imbalances, dental root canal and other infections.

FCT focuses only on the most relevant causes of disease, based on its guiding theory of the main ‘bullets’ of diseases, as taught through its curriculum (refer to the DVD/USB: The Extremely Complex Hidden Nature of Chronic Diseases and Proper Bio-Resonance Testing, as the only Key to Unlock These). This distinction has and can only come through long, consistent and successful experience with the most serious diseases, their documented reversals, as well as, learning from correcting failures.

High percentage of false ‘beneficial’ treatments
This is based on unknowingly forcing a patient to issue a positive testing response to tested ‘beneficial’ treatments due to practitioner’s inability to offer better choices, due to unawareness of these. A well-known phenomenon in quantum physics – the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox – that also plays a role in brain-to-brain energetic communi-cation or subconscious entanglement between people, explains this unspoken communi-cation. In this case, it takes place between a practitioner and a patient’s brain. This is the main reason why, as some physicists explained, it is impossible to carry out homeopathic trials using placebos, because even if a patient received one but once a homeopathic practitioner thinks of the right remedy for him, during an interview, the remedy may start working through the entanglement phenomenon. This, then, ruins the control or placebo group as a comparison subjects with those who have physically received the actual remedies. The bottom line of this phenomenon is that a patient’s brain reads the available options in a practitioner brain and settles for whatever is available. These can range, from good to terrible.

As a part of accepting ‘beneficial’ treatments, or being forced to, a patient may display this response to a detoxification which his organs will not be able to handle, or to a treatment of his other problem, that was offered in the wrong priority. In both cases he/she will incur more harm than benefit. Patients may also ‘accept’ treatments, in the absence of better choices, which would provide some immediate relief, such as antibiotics, colloidal silver, ozone, antifungals, probiotics, binders and other, with the delayed onset of harm.A concrete example of consenting to a ‘beneficial’ treatment that was really mediocre was demonstrated at one of my seminars. An alternative practitioner, a biological dentist, has determined through conducting Bio-resonance testing that a patient had a beneficial response to the products usually used by biological dentists and alternative practitioners for mercury detoxification. In order to avoid any element of subjectivity on my part, by testing the patient myself to FCT homeopathics for mercury detoxification, I offered him to test on his own FCT regimen on that patient.Following this, the practitioner stated that the patient’s reaction was positive to these remedies, too. I asked him, then, to re-test his initially ‘beneficial’ mercury detox products which, to his surprise, the patient immediately rejected once his body recognized a better, FCT, choice. This equally concerns EAV-computerized testing devices. Prior to having a demonstration of one of its leading brands in my office, I gave it the benefit of the doubt and contacted the “very satisfied practitioners who were getting very good results”, as stated by the manufacturer. As expected, the practitioners were getting ‘very good results’, as long as they were not familiar with the scientific criteria of good results. To my simple question concerning one of these criterion: “have you reversed a single chronic disease through this testing equipment and its recommended treatments?” the uniform answer was, “no”.The outcome of testing a popular EAV computerized device on patients in my officeIt was good 90% inaccurate, where sick organs were not diagnosed in some patients, but wrong problems were in other patients. In a patient with a significant bowel disturbance, the equipment did not detect any malfunctioned gastrointestinal organs. In a patient with multiple sclerosis, no malfunctions in the neurological system were detected either. A happy patient on the other hand, was diagnosed with depression. In spite of containing tens of thousands of pieces of data for screening and treatment options, it was obvious that the people who programmed these computers had poor knowledge of medicine. The database did not contain many necessary clinical items and treatment options consisted of ineffective and potentially harmful products. However, since my patients, who were tested by such a seemingly sophisticated technology, understandably, were very impressed by computer god, I refrained from making any negative comments and objecting to them taking the homeopathic remedies and supplements recommended by it. As expected, none of the patients experienced a positive response and in addition, the ‘depressed’ patient, instead of feeling even happier, developed a severe headache. Even while I do see its bigger potential given substantial corrections, based on FCT, but at the present time it is little more than a medical videogame to entertain and impress both practitioners and patients. The real computer scientists are aware of many limitations of these machines, as expressed by a former MIT pioneer in computer technology, Professor Marvin Minsky PhD, “No computer has ever been designed that is ever aware of what it’s doing; but most of the time, we aren’t either.” My acquaintance, retired physics professor at MIT, George E. Pugh, PhD shared with me how his computer software to conduct strategic operations for the Pentagon, during the Cold War, kept failing until he made the generals aware of limits of computers and adjust their objectives, accordingly. In September 2017, I watched on 60 minutes, the seemingly impressive most sophisticated ever computer software in conventional oncology to treat cancer. It was programmed with mega million pieces of data but only concerning the conventional view on cancer and its treatments. However, knowing the Achilles’ heel of oncology, an obsession with costly drugs and similar interventions, while ignoring and leaving inside the body the very bullets or causes of cancer – carcinogens – it was obvious that without addressing these through their proper diagnosis and treatment, this impressive project was dead on arrival. And it was, in spite of all of its fanfare and hope the treated patients, unfortunately, kept dying.

FCT Bio-resonance testing cannot avoid this subjective component of the testing either, where patients’ treatment choices are confined to the range of choices themselves. However, when the offered treatments are based on a sound theory and consistent successful experience, the odds of offering inferior choices are very low.

Therapeutic means and how these are different from the rest of homeopathic-energetic remedies in alternative medicine.
FCT chose homeopathic-energetic remedies as its main therapeutic modality for the following reasons:

Their application is based more on the selective important knowledge of conventional medicine and related important disciplines, such as toxicology, than homeopathy, per se.
This knowledge concerns the seed of all diseases – internal organs and tissues – with their corresponding anatomy, physiology, pathophysiology and interactions.

It includes knowledge of the most important causative agents of disease.
These are: infectious agents, toxicological agents or environmental pollutants, electromagnetic radiation, faulty diet, side effects of medications and substance abuse, dental treatments, physical and emotional traumas.

FCT remedies are highly specific in relation to malfunctioned organs in both disease and pre-disease stages, and to their causes.
This is unlike other homeopathics, including classical, and complex homeopathy such as homotoxicology and similar haphazard homeopathic products for chronic diseases.
The advantage of the concept of specificity has been demonstrated in conventional medicine where it is highly effective in acute infections and with vaccinations. The more exactly these corresponding measures match the actual versus similar microbes, the more effective they are. Since a violation of well-established concepts in science always backfire it is irrelevant whether it is violated by conventional, alternative, homeopathic, or 100 other medical approaches. The concrete cases presented further on this page confirm inevitability of failure when Bio-resonance testing and homeopathy violate this and other key concepts.

Avoidance of common supplements such as vitamins, detoxifiers, chelators, binders, immune stimulators or to ‘kill’ infections as Lyme, parasites, fungal and other.
These are ineffective, their multiple chain reactions are impossible to know and control often cause side effects and harm, which are explained by science of hormesis. Besides, as all of the pharmaceutical band-aids, they are void of any curative potential, yet can create extra problems by containing environmental pollutants (even if, ‘organic’ or ‘best quality’) and/or induce allergic reactions to its ingredients, fillers, capsules.

The treatment is strictly individualized based on each patients’ unique combination of malfunctioned organs and their causes, as determined by the Bio-resonance testing.
It addresses important clinical priorities between causes of disease, the effective and safe sequence of the remedies and their strength, and ability of many weak organs to handle the objectives of treatment, at each stage. It also provides proper guidance of patients in adjusting their environment and lifestyle from antagonistic to synergistic with the treatment.

The following are examples of common cases, where ‘similar’ to FCT interventions have failed and harmed:

▶️ Case 1
Wednesday, December 04, 2013
[email protected]

I would like ask one more question, maybe Dr. could comment on this. You see, I had a scary experience with a Bio-resonance testing last year and I don’t want this to happen again.

Here is what happened. A Bio-resonance test was done with an Asyra device at my home. The test results made a lot of sense: according to it I would need sarcodes (RNA, joint, connective tissues, motor neurons), dental-chord to get rid of mercury etc.

But then I stupidly suggested the therapist to test quinolone frequency on me…I had no idea what might happen…the device showed green light immediately and the therapist said: “wow look at this, a nosode made from this would cure you.”

But…as crazy as it sounds, I was “poisoned” again with that frequency! Within a few minutes, I felt like in the very beginning when I was poisoned years ago, my CNS went nuts, I got intense chills, I could not focus properly etc etc.

The therapist noticed what happened and panicked – but had no idea what to do…I guess the frequency resonated with the poison in my body and those poisons started moving around. It took 3 months to recover from that.

Have you ever heard of such an experience? What do you think really happened here? Is there any risk that this could happen with this treatment?

The lessons from this case:

Whether as it was the case in the previous example of a happy patient developing a headache from water programmed with frequencies or, in this case, of a reaction to a computer signal either one is not a placebo, but possesses a strong biological action

Humans respond to energetic signals of programmed water, computer or even in the course of muscle testing just as a computer does to a mouse

When these remedies and their frequencies are on target this is a blessing that leads to recovery, when off it’s a curse, as in this example

Neither the practitioners nor the companies which program these devices know how to undo the side effects of these treatments when these occur.

▶️ Case 2
The condition of a young woman has significantly deteriorated following alternative treatments: supplements, homeopathics, intravenous chelators all of which were based on their projected benefits, beforehand, by a Bio-resonance muscle testing carried out in that office.
There were several edifying points to this case.

The patient challenged that integrative medical doctor, who specializes in Bio-resonance testing concerning its quality, since it projected these treatments as beneficial, yet were followed by a new sickness. To this, the doctor honestly admitted to not having an answer. Another point is that this particular technique, a variety of applied kinesiology has been publicized in alternative medicine as highly special because of its alleged ability to test at the level of the autonomic nervous system. Even if it did, this, per se, as at any other ‘special’ level, quantum, DNA etc., does not guarantee good quality of elicited information, or treatment in relation to the true causes of disease.

When I questioned a naturopathic doctor, who authored a big book, with this test being prominently featured, there, because she and that MD, the inventor, allegedly conducted some impressive ‘research’ to substantiate this ‘special’ test, her explanation was far less impressive. As usual in alternative medicine, she could not support the claim and even abandoned this test in her own practice.

Extending another credit to that MD for his honesty, he advised the young woman that he and his staff of naturopathic doctors did not know how to undo the side effects and referred her to FCT for that.

▶️ Case 3
An integrative osteopathic physician shared with me how exciting of a practice he ran for 30 years, using Bio-resonance testing and complex homeopathics based on a theory of homotoxicology of German physicians, Reckeweg brothers. The theory, on the surface, as all semi-truths, sounds impressive in stating that some toxins cause chronic diseases in progressing stages, and that their homeopathic formulations are supposed to regress and prevent these stages. I shared with him that, even though a theory of toxins causing disease makes good sense, but its ‘solution’ that is taught by the company which distributes these formulations represents nothing short of a reckless disregard for patients’ safety. The reasons are that this theory is very vague concerning the exact nature of these toxins, which automatically renders these homeopathic formulas as shooting in the dark, to begin with. The stages do formally exist, based on conventional medicine findings of progressive degeneration of cells, yet there is zero evidence that these remedies regress any of these stages. Worst of all, it was obvious to anyone who has studied classical homeopathy, as myself, that these homeopathics contained very powerful constitutional remedies which, besides being too nonspecific to treat any chronic disease, are prone to cause severe aggravations, due to the depth and power of their biological actions. Besides, when these aggravations persist, neither the company nor the practitioners know how to resolve these. He disagreed and said that he used Bio-resonance testing for guidance to use these remedies effectively and safely. However, as other practitioners, he admitted to having no documented evidence of reversed serious chronic diseases. Not surprising, this doctor, himself not being too old, had to retire due to severe health problems, which included two potentially fatal diseases, in spite of using these remedies. When, later on, I tested him with FCT Bio-resonance testing in my office, in spite of his practicing such ‘powerful detoxifying’ medical system, his body tested as being severely intoxicated and infected. This, unfortunately, also included his brain, which explained his visibly compromised mental function. Furthermore, at a later time, he asked me how homeopathic remedies even work. This is after 30 years of using the remedies under the ‘educational guidance’ of the company.

▶️ Case 4
Germany has been widely considered in alternative medicine as its mecca, due to its innovative technology, especially in computerized and other Bio-resonance testing technology. However, as already stated, no medical technology can shake off its foundation — a corresponding paradigm/model/theory — related to how to view disease, awareness of its primary causes and their optimal diagnosis and treatment. Many years ago when I wasn’t aware of these fundamentals, I attended the alternative medicine mecca—annual Baden-Baden Medicine Week—in Germany. But as impressed just as confused I became after looking at hundreds of machines and alternative inventory, combined, from computerized EAV and VEGA, to things delivering some special light, sound, laser and other waves, and from ingesting and infusing all sorts of things to balancing the same. There was no logistical telling what to do first and how is one better than the other. Nevertheless, every booth was handing heavy marketing literature all saying ‘this is it’. All similar displays at medical expos and professional conferences whether in the US, or elsewhere, look just as impressive and deceptive. This is like attending a world exhibition of some advanced weapons where no one really knows whether nuclear submarines are used best for water, air or street battles or tanks for ground or space ones. A few concrete examples of the price for this confusion, a few years ago I met a middle aged integrative MD, in Germany, who was implementing many of these sophisticated technologies, including computerized Bio-resonance testing in his practice and self-care. I shared my opinion with him about the serious limits of these approaches and also a concern that he did not look healthy. I suggested that he studies FCT and use it for his health, too. He, politely, ignored these. A year later I learned that he, unfortunately, died from cancer. So did at the same age, from a heart disease, a former director of the organization that trained in German computerized Bio-resonance testing technology, organized the training trips to Germany and who was an expert practitioner in this testing and use of homeopathic formulas. Unfortunately, this as all other Bio-resonance tests and homeopathics were “using the language that did not have the word snow in it”.

The information presented in this section has hopefully made its objective sufficiently clear that God has not created, unlike us people, all tests and treatments equal.

Conclusion

“Master algorithms require far less factual knowledge.”
Professor Edward O. Wilson, PhD

Both medicines have failed to deliver high quality health care in the treatment and prevention of chronic diseases. Conventional medicine due to its obsession with pharmaceuticals, alternative-integrative medicine with anything else.

Based on the important tool of science to intelligently classify and interpret produced data, FCT has adhered to the following medical algorithm.
The FCT Algorithm for Practicing Medicine
Producing consistent positive results in solving chronic and acute diseases, based on cause-specific diagnosis and treatment

⇓

Formulating a sound working theory concerning the real causes and true nature of chronic diseases

⇙ ⇓ ⇘

Conducting limited but far more productive focused research, deeming many other research projects and their funding unnecessary
Deeming utilized primary diagnostic means as highly effective in determining main causes of disease. Rendering other diagnostic tests to be of limited importance and drastically reducing their use
Deeming utilized primary therapeutic means as highly effective and necessary, rendering other therapeutic means as generally unnecesary, limiting their use and associated morbidity and mortality

⇓

Delivering far more effective general and preventative healthcare with gigantic savings in healthcare costs, in the hundreds of billions of dollars, annually. Reducing fiscal burden on the health insurance sector, public and businesses,
due to reduced healthcare costs and health insurance premiums
Your next step in starting to study FCT

There are two video courses which medical practitioners have found as a good window into FCT: “The Extremely Complex Hidden Nature of Chronic Diseases and Proper Bio-Resonance Testing, as the only Key to Unlock These” and Basic DVD Course. These serve to accomplish several objectives:

To discern the real very complex and individualized nature of chronic diseases

Why the current conventional and alternative-integrative paradigms cannot possibly match it and inevitably fail

How FCT matches this complexity

Scientific limitations of all of the main diagnostic and treatment methods in both medicines

To see if FCT is for you in a first place

To realize the necessity of FCT for one’s own treatment and prevention of health problems.

Following this, if you decide to pursue further study of FCT you should contact our office and we will advise you accordingly, depending on your professional credentials, dedication and goals.

Lay alternative practitioners will not be able to master FCT, but the important knowledge contained in its program will help them to understand limitations of their approaches, minimize an incidence of side effects of their treatments and how to properly treat and prevent their health problems, through FCT.

“FCT has proven Professor Tiller’s prediction of
future medicine being based on
controlled energy fields, correct.
And your practice can prosper, as it has of our skillful
practitioners, by practicing the future medicine, today!”
FCT Founder Savely Yurkovsky, MD